Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adapt guide to be inclusive of API testing #5

Open
itscooper opened this issue Jun 15, 2017 · 9 comments
Open

Adapt guide to be inclusive of API testing #5

itscooper opened this issue Jun 15, 2017 · 9 comments
Assignees
Labels
good first issue new New content to write revise Needs quality review, updates, or revision
Milestone

Comments

@itscooper
Copy link
Contributor

Web-based APIs can, for the most part, be testing using this guide. Some elements are naturally client-side and therefore irrelevant to API testing.

I suggest that we create an article in section 3 or 4.1 that talks about how the guide can be used for API testing.

I further suggest that we review the existing articles to ensure that the language used is appropriate for web app and APIs alike, and determine where any additions might be needed where testing for the same issue on an API involves a different process.

ManhNho added a commit to ManhNho/OWASP-Testing-Guide-v5 that referenced this issue Feb 27, 2019
@kingthorin kingthorin added the new New content to write label Mar 27, 2019
@kingthorin kingthorin added this to the Add New Testing Scenarios milestone Aug 18, 2019
@victoriadrake victoriadrake added the revise Needs quality review, updates, or revision label Jan 16, 2020
@victoriadrake
Copy link
Collaborator

#76 partially addressed this issue. A review of existing articles is still outstanding.

@victoriadrake victoriadrake removed this from the v4.x: Add New milestone Jan 22, 2020
@kingthorin kingthorin added this to the v5.0 Release milestone Apr 28, 2020
@kingthorin kingthorin added the HacktoberFest Issues which are good candidates for HacktoberFest: https://hacktoberfest.digitalocean label Oct 1, 2020
@kingthorin kingthorin removed the HacktoberFest Issues which are good candidates for HacktoberFest: https://hacktoberfest.digitalocean label Nov 2, 2020
@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@kingthorin kingthorin added the HacktoberFest Issues which are good candidates for HacktoberFest: https://hacktoberfest.digitalocean label Oct 1, 2021
@kingthorin kingthorin removed the HacktoberFest Issues which are good candidates for HacktoberFest: https://hacktoberfest.digitalocean label Nov 4, 2021
@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@garthoid
Copy link
Contributor

I can take this one.

@garthoid
Copy link
Contributor

garthoid commented May 26, 2024

I see there is “testing for APIs” page (in the root of the repo). I would like to suggest taking this content and reworking it into several subtopics within the API section.

Starting with a 00-API Testing Overview Section.
Then renaming 01-Testing for GraphQL to some later number but keeping the content intact
Next, 01-Finding APIs, the recon of finding APIs to test
Following with section on specific testing based on the API top 10.

Interesting in leadership thoughts on this approach.

@victoriadrake
Copy link
Collaborator

I see there is “testing for APIs” page (in the root of the repo). I would like to suggest taking this content and reworking it into several subtopics within the API section.

Starting with a 00-API Testing Overview Section. Then renaming 01-Testing for GraphQL to some later number but keeping the content intact Next, 01-Finding APIs, the recon of finding APIs to test Following with section on specific testing based on the API top 10.

Interesting in leadership thoughts on this approach.

I think this makes sense! Would you like to do a rough draft for the new content? I'm happy to help go over it then.

@garthoid
Copy link
Contributor

garthoid commented Jun 2, 2024

I think this makes sense! Would you like to do a rough draft for the new content? I'm happy to help go over it then.

Thank you. I almost have a PR ready for the Overview section.

@garthoid
Copy link
Contributor

garthoid commented Jun 4, 2024

I think this makes sense! Would you like to do a rough draft for the new content? I'm happy to help go over it then.

@victoriadrake There is a PR available for you to review.

kingthorin added a commit to kingthorin/wstg that referenced this issue Jun 6, 2024
Related to OWASP#5 and follow-up to OWASP#1140

Signed-off-by: kingthorin <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
good first issue new New content to write revise Needs quality review, updates, or revision
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants