Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update dependency rubocop-performance to v1.22.1 #808

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 22, 2024

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Sep 22, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
rubocop-performance (source, changelog) 1.22.0 -> 1.22.1 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

rubocop/rubocop-performance (rubocop-performance)

v1.22.1

Compare Source

Bug fixes
  • #​468: Fix false positives for Performance/BigDecimalWithNumericArgument when using float argument for BigDecimal. ([@​koic][])

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "after 3am on monday,before 6am on monday" in timezone Asia/Tokyo, Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot enabled auto-merge (rebase) September 22, 2024 19:15
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/rubocop-performance-1.22.x-lockfile branch from 2b6873e to 7485356 Compare September 22, 2024 19:15
@renovate renovate bot merged commit e94332d into main Sep 22, 2024
5 checks passed
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/rubocop-performance-1.22.x-lockfile branch September 22, 2024 19:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants