Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

EvalComment* commands fail in Racket #438

Closed
thesergiomiguel opened this issue Nov 23, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed

EvalComment* commands fail in Racket #438

thesergiomiguel opened this issue Nov 23, 2022 · 3 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working client-racket

Comments

@thesergiomiguel
Copy link

Hi.

:ConjureEvalComment* commands have always been flaky at best for me with Racket. Previously I tried playing with Clojure and that worked great, all of the time. I've looked for other people with similar issues but can't find any, so I'm assuming it's something with my setup. What info would help you debug?

Screen.Recording.2022-11-23.at.09.07.50.mov

Moreover, I'd like to take the opportunity to say thank you, and woah!, for Conjure. It still boggles my mind that such a cool thing exists, and is built by one person. Well done!

@Olical Olical added bug Something isn't working client-racket labels Nov 26, 2022
@Olical
Copy link
Owner

Olical commented Nov 26, 2022

Oh interesting, thanks for reporting! I thought this was to do with the current stdio / cli REPL support (which I'm going to start rewriting today) but that actually looks different. I'll have a look, thank you!

@Olical
Copy link
Owner

Olical commented Nov 26, 2022

Should be fixed on the develop branch! Thanks for bringing it to my attention.

@Olical Olical closed this as completed Nov 26, 2022
@thesergiomiguel
Copy link
Author

Thanks a lot, I can't believe how quickly you fixed this. It's a great thing you've built here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working client-racket
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants