Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[utils/common] Ask user permission to upload log on dpaste.com #176

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 10, 2024

Conversation

goldyfruit
Copy link
Member

@goldyfruit goldyfruit commented Oct 10, 2024

Based on #172 (comment)

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a user prompt for consent to upload log files during installation errors, enhancing security practices.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling by integrating user consent into the error management process.
  • Style

    • Adjusted formatting of failure messages for better readability.

@goldyfruit goldyfruit added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 10, 2024
@goldyfruit goldyfruit added this to the Descent milestone Oct 10, 2024
@goldyfruit goldyfruit self-assigned this Oct 10, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 10, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new function, ask_optin(), to the utils/common.sh script, which prompts users for permission to upload log files to a specified URL. This function is integrated into the existing on_error() function to enhance error handling during installation. Additionally, the formatting of the failure message has been updated, and minor adjustments were made to the apt_ensure() function's loop syntax.

Changes

File Change Summary
utils/common.sh - Added function ask_optin() for user consent on log uploads.
- Updated on_error() to call ask_optin().
- Adjusted failure message formatting.
- Minor formatting change in apt_ensure() for-loop syntax.

Poem

In the script where errors dwell,
A new prompt rings a gentle bell.
"May I upload?" it sweetly asks,
Ensuring privacy in our tasks.
With each change, we hop along,
Enhancing safety, making us strong! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@goldyfruit goldyfruit mentioned this pull request Oct 10, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
utils/common.sh (2)

10-27: Approve new ask_optin() function with a minor suggestion.

The new ask_optin() function is a good addition, implementing user consent for log uploads, which enhances privacy and security. The logic is sound, ensuring valid user input.

Consider adding a brief explanation of why the log upload might be necessary, to help users make an informed decision. For example:

 function ask_optin() {
     while true; do
+        echo "Uploading the log can help us diagnose and fix issues with your installation."
         read -rp "Upload the log on https://dpaste.com website? (yes/no) " yn
         case $yn in

Line range hint 496-507: Approve changes to apt_ensure() function with a minor suggestion.

The modifications to the apt_ensure() function improve code formatting and array handling. The use of ${ARGS[@]} in the for-loop is the correct way to iterate over all arguments passed to the function.

For improved clarity, consider adding a comment explaining the conversion of arguments to an array:

 function apt_ensure() {
     # Note the $@ is not actually an array, but we can convert it to one
     # https://linuxize.com/post/bash-functions/#passing-arguments-to-bash-functions
     ARGS=("$@")
+    # Now ARGS is a proper array containing all function arguments
     MISS_PKGS=()
     HIT_PKGS=()
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between eecae47 and 8013e8c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • utils/common.sh (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
utils/common.sh (2)

33-34: Approve changes to on_error() function.

The modifications to the on_error() function improve error message readability and integrate the new user consent mechanism appropriately. This ensures that logs are only uploaded with user permission, enhancing privacy and user control.


Line range hint 1-527: Overall assessment: Changes improve user privacy and code quality.

The modifications to utils/common.sh are well-implemented and enhance the script's functionality. The new ask_optin() function adds an important user consent mechanism for log uploads, improving privacy. The changes to existing functions (on_error() and apt_ensure()) improve error handling and code consistency.

Minor suggestions have been made to further enhance clarity and user experience, but overall, these changes are a positive improvement to the script.

@goldyfruit goldyfruit merged commit fa3c524 into main Oct 10, 2024
8 of 9 checks passed
@goldyfruit goldyfruit deleted the feat/dpaste_optin branch October 10, 2024 23:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant