Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Exception: Shape type 'Widget_DetailAdmin' not found #1337

Closed
parxal opened this issue Jan 4, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

Exception: Shape type 'Widget_DetailAdmin' not found #1337

parxal opened this issue Jan 4, 2018 · 2 comments
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@parxal
Copy link

parxal commented Jan 4, 2018

I was trying to create a list of a content type to be display inside a widget.

Steps :
Create a content type

  • Display Name : ListWidget
  • Stereotype : Widget
  • Remove Creatable
  • Remove Listable
  • Add Part 'List' / choose another content type in List Contained Content Types for the list

Go to Layers
In content Add Widget 'ListWidget' named 'Home Links'

Now in Layers page click in 'Home Links' that error appers.

@sebastienros sebastienros added this to the beta2 milestone Jan 4, 2018
@sebastienros sebastienros modified the milestones: beta2, beta3 Jun 11, 2018
@sebastienros sebastienros added the P3 label Dec 6, 2018
@sebastienros sebastienros modified the milestones: beta3, rc Dec 6, 2018
@arkadiuszwojcik
Copy link
Contributor

I get similar exception but for ContentPart. Looks like default DetailAdmin view is not generated for custom parts. Error I get is Shape type 'ContentPart_DetailAdmin' not found. After spending some time on this I found that there is no ContentPart.DetailAdmin.cshtml in project: OrchardCore.Modules/OrchardCore.Contents/Views. Widget module is also missing DetailAdmin view.

@sebastienros
Copy link
Member

Might a recent bug as we introduced support for theming custom content part last month.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants