Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Testnets #120

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 29, 2024
Merged

Testnets #120

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 29, 2024

Conversation

martillansky
Copy link
Contributor

@martillansky martillansky commented Oct 29, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Reformatted tsconfig.json for improved readability without changing any configurations.
    • Modified the vercel.json file's rewrites array format to a multi-line structure for better clarity, maintaining existing functionality.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 29, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes include reformatting of the tsconfig.json and vercel.json files to enhance readability. In tsconfig.json, the compilerOptions section and its nested properties were indented for better clarity, while the include and exclude sections remained unchanged. In vercel.json, the rewrites array was modified from a single-line to a multi-line format, also for improved readability. No functionality or values were altered in either file.

Changes

File Change Summary
tsconfig.json Reformatted compilerOptions for better readability; no changes to options.
vercel.json Reformatted rewrites array from single-line to multi-line for readability; no changes to logic.

Poem

🐇 In the land of code so bright,
Where JSON shines with all its might,
Indents and lines now dance in glee,
A clearer view for you and me!
With every change, our paths align,
A tidy code, a joy divine! 🌟


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 08b3442 and 8fff3ef.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • tsconfig.json (1 hunks)
  • vercel.json (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • tsconfig.json
  • vercel.json

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Oct 29, 2024

Deploy Preview for proof-of-humanity-v2 ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 8fff3ef
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/proof-of-humanity-v2/deploys/6720dc37b99f2700075bb47e
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-120--proof-of-humanity-v2.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@martillansky martillansky merged commit f38130e into master Oct 29, 2024
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant