Testnets #134
Testnets #134
Conversation
Native v1 profiles cannot needs a frontend workaround until legacy subgraph is updated
fix: legacy subgraph registration issue
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
✅ Deploy Preview for proof-of-humanity-v2 ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
src/data/user.ts (3)
Line range hint
8-19: Document the function's side effects and purposeThe function mutates the input array directly, which should be documented. Additionally, the temporary nature of this fix should be tracked.
Consider adding more detailed documentation:
-// This fixes an error in the legacy subgraph were registration has not -// been removed as expected. Once solved the issue at subgraph level this -// function should be removed +/** + * Sanitizes user registration data to handle legacy subgraph inconsistencies. + * @param res Array of MeQuery results to sanitize + * @warning This function mutates the input array + * @warning Temporary fix - Remove once subgraph issue #<ISSUE_NUMBER> is resolved + */
11-17: Consider adding error logging for debuggingGiven this handles error conditions in production, adding logging would help track occurrences.
Consider adding debug logging:
if (claimer.claimer?.currentRequest.index <= -100) { + console.debug('Sanitizing invalid request index', { account: claimer.id }); claimer.claimer.currentRequest = null; } else if (res.filter((cl) => cl.claimer?.registration).length > 1) { + console.debug('Sanitizing duplicate registration', { account: claimer.id }); claimer.claimer.registration = null; } else { + console.debug('Sanitizing current request', { account: claimer.id }); claimer.claimer.currentRequest = null;
Line range hint
8-19: Track the temporary nature of this fixThe comment indicates this is a temporary fix, but there's no tracking mechanism.
Would you like me to create a GitHub issue to track the removal of this temporary fix once the subgraph issue is resolved? This would help ensure this technical debt is properly tracked and addressed.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/data/user.ts(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/data/user.ts (1)
Line range hint 8-19: Verify the impact of sanitization logic
The function handles complex state transitions between registrations and requests. Let's verify the usage patterns.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now provide a final response about the sanitization logic verification:
Sanitization logic is handling a legacy subgraph issue correctly
The sanitization function is specifically designed to handle a known issue in the legacy subgraph where registrations are not properly removed. This is confirmed by:
- The comment above the function explicitly states its purpose: "This fixes an error in the legacy subgraph were registration has not been removed as expected"
- The logic ensures data consistency by:
- Nullifying currentRequest when index <= -100
- Handling duplicate registrations by keeping only one active registration
- Managing the relationship between registrations and requests
The codebase shows consistent usage of this sanitization pattern across different components:
src/data/claimer.tsimplements similar sanitization for registration datasrc/data/sanitizer.tshandles registration evidence and request synchronization- UI components in
src/app/[pohid]/properly handle null registration states
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Analyze the usage patterns of registration and currentRequest
# Check for other places that might be affected by this sanitization
echo "Searching for registration and currentRequest usage patterns..."
rg -A 3 "registration|currentRequest" --type ts
# Look for similar patterns that might need the same treatment
echo "Searching for similar claimer patterns..."
ast-grep --pattern 'claimer?.registration'
Length of output: 48460
| } else if (res.filter((cl) => cl.claimer?.registration).length > 1) { | ||
| claimer.claimer.registration = null; | ||
| } else { | ||
| claimer.claimer.currentRequest = null; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve type safety and efficiency of the registration check
The current implementation could be more robust and efficient.
Consider these improvements:
- } else if (res.filter((cl) => cl.claimer?.registration).length > 1) {
+ } else if (res.some((cl, index) =>
+ cl.claimer?.registration &&
+ res.some((other, otherIndex) =>
+ index !== otherIndex && other.claimer?.registration
+ )
+ )) {
claimer.claimer.registration = null;
} else {
claimer.claimer.currentRequest = null;This version:
- Stops at the first duplicate found (more efficient)
- More clearly expresses the intent to find duplicates
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| } else if (res.filter((cl) => cl.claimer?.registration).length > 1) { | |
| claimer.claimer.registration = null; | |
| } else { | |
| claimer.claimer.currentRequest = null; | |
| } | |
| } else if (res.some((cl, index) => | |
| cl.claimer?.registration && | |
| res.some((other, otherIndex) => | |
| index !== otherIndex && other.claimer?.registration | |
| ) | |
| )) { | |
| claimer.claimer.registration = null; | |
| } else { | |
| claimer.claimer.currentRequest = null; | |
| } |
Summary by CodeRabbit
claimerproperties to ensure accurate registration and request status based on the presence of multiple registrations.