Testnets #142
Testnets #142
Conversation
user alert allowed video file types
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request focus on enhancing the video upload functionality within the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
✅ Deploy Preview for proof-of-humanity-v2 ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/app/[pohid]/claim/Video.tsx (2)
15-20: Consider improving error message readability.The error messages could be more user-friendly and maintainable:
- fileType: `Unsupported video format. Please use ${ALLOWED_VIDEO_TYPES.map((t) => t.split("/")[1]).join(", ")}`, + fileType: `Unsupported video format. Allowed formats are: ${ALLOWED_VIDEO_TYPES.map((t) => t.split("/")[1]).join(", ")}`,Also applies to: 31-32
File size validation is already implemented but needs to be fixed
The code already has file size validation logic, but there's an issue where
MAX_SIZEis being overridden toundefined://const MAX_SIZE = 7; // Megabytes <-- commented out const MAX_SIZE = undefined;This effectively disables the size validation since
MAX_SIZE_BYTESbecomesundefined. The validation code exists but won't trigger:if (MAX_SIZE_BYTES && blob.size > MAX_SIZE_BYTES) { videoError(ERROR_MSG.size); return console.error(ERROR_MSG.size); }
- Uncomment the original
MAX_SIZE = 7and remove the line that sets it toundefined- For consistency with the Photo component which uses 3MB limit, consider adjusting the video size limit
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
126-134: Consider enhancing video validation and UI messaging.
- The hardcoded message about accepted formats could use the
ALLOWED_VIDEO_TYPESconstant to stay in sync:- <strong> - Upload only in accepted formats (webm, mp4, avi, and mov) to avoid - losing your deposit - </strong> + <strong> + Upload only in accepted formats ({ALLOWED_VIDEO_TYPES.map(t => t.split('/')[1]).join(', ')}) to avoid + losing your deposit + </strong>
- Consider adding client-side file size validation before upload to improve user experience:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if there are any file size validations in other components rg -A 5 'MAX_SIZE|maxSize|filesize|file.size'Length of output: 2632
| videoError(ERROR_MSG.unexpected); | ||
| return console.error(error); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve error handling and debugging.
While using a generic error message for users is good, we should preserve error details for debugging:
- videoError(ERROR_MSG.unexpected);
- return console.error(error);
+ videoError(ERROR_MSG.unexpected);
+ return console.error('Video processing failed:', error);Consider adding error tracking/monitoring for production environments to help identify and fix issues proactively.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| videoError(ERROR_MSG.unexpected); | |
| return console.error(error); | |
| } | |
| videoError(ERROR_MSG.unexpected); | |
| return console.error('Video processing failed:', error); | |
| } |
| if (!ALLOWED_VIDEO_TYPES.includes(file.type)) { | ||
| const msg = | ||
| "Uploaded file type: " + | ||
| file.type.split("/")[1] + | ||
| ". ".concat(ERROR_MSG.fileType); | ||
| videoError(msg); | ||
| return console.error(msg); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance file type validation robustness.
The current validation logic could be improved for better maintainability and reliability:
- if (!ALLOWED_VIDEO_TYPES.includes(file.type)) {
- const msg =
- "Uploaded file type: " +
- file.type.split("/")[1] +
- ". ".concat(ERROR_MSG.fileType);
- videoError(msg);
- return console.error(msg);
- }
+ const fileType = file.type.toLowerCase();
+ if (!ALLOWED_VIDEO_TYPES.map(t => t.toLowerCase()).includes(fileType)) {
+ const msg = `Uploaded file type: ${fileType.split("/")[1]}. ${ERROR_MSG.fileType}`;
+ videoError(msg);
+ return console.error(msg);
+ }This change:
- Makes the validation case-insensitive
- Uses template literals for better readability
- Simplifies the error message construction
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if (!ALLOWED_VIDEO_TYPES.includes(file.type)) { | |
| const msg = | |
| "Uploaded file type: " + | |
| file.type.split("/")[1] + | |
| ". ".concat(ERROR_MSG.fileType); | |
| videoError(msg); | |
| return console.error(msg); | |
| } | |
| const fileType = file.type.toLowerCase(); | |
| if (!ALLOWED_VIDEO_TYPES.map(t => t.toLowerCase()).includes(fileType)) { | |
| const msg = `Uploaded file type: ${fileType.split("/")[1]}. ${ERROR_MSG.fileType}`; | |
| videoError(msg); | |
| return console.error(msg); | |
| } |
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes