Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Extend process interface #105

Closed
szabo137 opened this issue May 21, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #106
Closed

Extend process interface #105

szabo137 opened this issue May 21, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #106
Assignees
@szabo137
Labels
06 - Feature-request Missing feature or functionality
Milestone
Release-0.3.0

Comments

@szabo137
Copy link
Member

szabo137 commented May 21, 2024 •
edited
Loading

In the current implementation, we decided to attach the spin/polarization information to the AbstractProcessDefinition. Therefore, it is obvious to implement accessor functions like incoming_spin_pol and outgoing_spin_pol returning a tuple of the respective spins and pols (similar to incoming_particles and outgoing_particles).

This should also be reflected in the process interface.
@szabo137 szabo137 added the 06 - Feature-request Missing feature or functionality label May 21, 2024
@szabo137 szabo137 self-assigned this May 21, 2024
@szabo137
Copy link
Member Author

This will be moved to QEDbase.jl in the context of the restructuring of QED.jl.

@AntonReinhard AntonReinhard transferred this issue from QEDjl-project/QEDprocesses.jl Aug 6, 2024
@AntonReinhard AntonReinhard mentioned this issue Aug 6, 2024
Merged
@AntonReinhard AntonReinhard added this to the Release-next milestone Aug 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@szabo137 szabo137

Labels
06 - Feature-request Missing feature or functionality
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Release-0.3.0
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Spin and Polarization Interface for AbstractProcessDefinition AntonReinhard/QEDbase.jl
2 participants
@szabo137 @AntonReinhard