-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
AbstractSampler Interface #12
Conversation
3d5308d
to
b56437c
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
First comments and questions.
Co-authored-by: Uwe Hernandez Acosta <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Uwe Hernandez Acosta <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Uwe Hernandez Acosta <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
More comments. Furthermore, consider renaming test/interfaces.jl
to test/interfaces/sampler_interface.jl
. There will be more interfaces to be tested.
Co-authored-by: Uwe Hernandez Acosta <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In general, the PR looks good to me, and after resolving the _rand!
piracy, it can be merged.
@tjungni could you please update the bullet points in the description?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One last comment, then I am happy to merge this!
Co-authored-by: Uwe Hernandez Acosta <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for providing this PR, it looks fine to me now and is ready for merging.
@tjungni Could you please run the formatter on the last version of your contribution?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there any specific reason why the parameters are called smplr
instead of sampler
everywhere? Am I not seeing a name shadowing? Otherwise, it seems a little obtuse for 2 saved characters.
Co-authored-by: Anton Reinhard <[email protected]>
@AntonReinhard I replyed to all of your comments. Please approve, if you are happy with this 😺 |
Thank you! |
TODO: