Update blog post

src/content/posts/reading-notes-critique-of-pure-reason/index.md

@@ -39,6 +39,15 @@ held space and time to be self-subsisting entities existing independently of the
 Leibnizians, who held space and time to be systems of relations, conceptual constructs based on non-relational
 properties inhering in the things we think of as spatiotemporally related
 
+:::tip
+
+The classical presentation of this dispute is in the correspondence between Leibniz and the Newtonian Samuel Clarke,
+published by Clarke in 1717 after Leibniz's death the previous year; see H. G . Alexander, ed.,[_The Leibniz-Clarke
+Correspondence_](https://archive.org/details/leibnizclarkecor00clar/mode/2up) (Manchester: Manchester University 
+Press, 1 956).
+
+:::
+
 Kant's alternative to both of these positions is that space and time are neither subsistent beings nor inherent in
 things as they are in themselves, but are rather only forms of our sensibility, hence conditions under which objects of
 experience can be given at all and the fundamental