Ibpsa merge custom errors

[FWuellhorst]

fix errors which are due to moved files or changed model behaviour.

[ebc-aixlib-bot]

Errors in regression test. Compare the results on the following page\n https://rwth-ebc.github.io/AixLib/IBPSA_MergeCustomErrors/charts

[ebc-aixlib-bot]

Errors in regression test. Compare the results on the following page\n https://rwth-ebc.github.io/AixLib/IBPSA_MergeCustomErrors/charts

[ebc-aixlib-bot]

Thank you for making a Pull Request to AixLib!

Our CI pipeline will help you finalize your contribution.
Here's what is typically checked:

• HTML syntax of your models, primarily in your documentation.
• Adherence to the naming convention in all changed files.
• Ability to check all models.
• Ability to simulate all models, if they are examples.
• If your contribution changes existing reference results.

If HTML errors occur, I will fix the issues using a separate pull request.
For the other checks, I will post the results here: https://rwth-ebc.github.io/AixLib/IBPSA_MergeCustomErrors/index.html

Tips to fix possible naming violations:

• Stick to the naming guidelines, e.g. Namespace Requirements
• Do all paramaters, variables, models, etc. have a description?
• Use absolute paths to classes! -> AixLib.Fluid.HeatExchangers.Radiator - Avoid: HeatExchangers.Radiator

If all CI stages pass and you have addressed possible naming violations, please consider the following:

• Use "group" and "tab" annotations to achieve a good visualization window.
• Use units consistently.
• Instantiate the replaceable medium package as:
  replaceable package Medium = Modelica.Media.Interfaces.PartialMedium "Medium model";
  instead of using a full media model like AixLib.Media.Water directly.
• Never using absolute paths to files (e.g., C: or D:). Replace them with modelica://AixLib/....
• Ensure your documentation is helpful and concise.
• Make sure icons are clear. Please avoid using images!
• Stick to 80 characters per line, as long as it makes sense.
• Add or modify examples for new or revised models.
• Include a simulate-and-plot script as a regression test for new models.
  How? Follow the documentation here: https://github.com/ibpsa/modelica-ibpsa/wiki/Unit-Tests#how-to-include-models-as-part-of-the-unit-tests
  Tip: To create the initial script, you can use Dymolas script generator, explained here: https://www.claytex.com/tech-blog/how-to-use-a-plot-script/)

Once you have addressed these points, you can assign a reviewer.
Although this process may seem tedious, ensuring CI passes allows the reviewer to focus
their time on the actual modeling rather than syntax and unintended breakages caused by your changes.

If you have any questions or issues, please tag a library developer.
Once again, thank you for your valuable contribution!

[ebc-aixlib-bot]

Errors in regression test. Compare the results on the following page\n https://rwth-ebc.github.io/AixLib/IBPSA_MergeCustomErrors/charts

[ebc-aixlib-bot]

Errors in regression test. Compare the results on the following page\n https://rwth-ebc.github.io/AixLib/IBPSA_MergeCustomErrors/charts

[ebc-aixlib-bot]

Errors in regression test. Compare the results on the following page\n https://rwth-ebc.github.io/AixLib/IBPSA_MergeCustomErrors/charts

[ebc-aixlib-bot]

Errors in regression test. Compare the results on the following page\n https://rwth-ebc.github.io/AixLib/IBPSA_MergeCustomErrors/charts

[ebc-aixlib-bot]

Errors in regression test. Compare the results on the following page\n https://rwth-ebc.github.io/AixLib/IBPSA_MergeCustomErrors/charts

[ebc-aixlib-bot]

Errors in regression test. Compare the results on the following page\n https://rwth-ebc.github.io/AixLib/IBPSA_MergeCustomErrors/charts

[ebc-aixlib-bot]

Errors in regression test. Compare the results on the following page\n https://rwth-ebc.github.io/AixLib/IBPSA_MergeCustomErrors/charts

[ebc-aixlib-bot]

Errors in regression test. Compare the results on the following page\n https://rwth-ebc.github.io/AixLib/IBPSA_MergeCustomErrors/charts

[ebc-aixlib-bot]

Errors in regression test. Compare the results on the following page\n https://rwth-ebc.github.io/AixLib/IBPSA_MergeCustomErrors/charts

[ebc-aixlib-bot]

Errors in regression test. Compare the results on the following page\n https://rwth-ebc.github.io/AixLib/IBPSA_MergeCustomErrors/charts

[ebc-aixlib-bot]

Errors in regression test. Compare the results on the following page\n https://rwth-ebc.github.io/AixLib/IBPSA_MergeCustomErrors/charts

[FWuellhorst]

@martinkremer
I updated the reference results for GenericAHU model and changed the computation of the efficiency to the Euler number. Thus, the global efficiency drops from 66.5 % to 49 %, leading to slightly changed results.

[ebc-aixlib-bot]

Errors in regression test. Compare the results on the following page\n https://rwth-ebc.github.io/AixLib/IBPSA_MergeCustomErrors/charts

[FWuellhorst]

@KremerMartin @larissakuehn @TobiasSpratte
Can someone of you have a quick look or just approve this PR? The CI passes, and I explained all changes below. I left the base branch not main to see what I changed aside from the +1000 new files in the actual merge of IBPSA.

This PR fixes errors and introduces changes based on the latest IBPSA merge.

• Either delete deleted in IBPSA or move to obsolete
• rename models to allow regression tests
• fix missing PumpHeadControlled
• Adjust IndoorSwimmingPool mover model, already discussed with @larissakuehn. Changes in regression results approved
• Change solver in simulate and plot scripts of ROM models to CVode, as in TEASER and because equippedExamples lead to stalled simulations in CI with Radau.
• Update NRPM models in Systems as nrpm is deprectated. As the default efficiency calculation in IBPSA was changed to Euler (with lower efficiencies), update GenericAHU example and results (only slight deviations) as approved by @KremerMartin
• Update version to 2.0.0 as Mover changes are not fully backwards compatible and the HeatPump model will move to obsolete at the hackday tomorrow, now that the new HP model is finally in AixLib.

[KremerMartin]

Thanks a lot @FWuellhorst for your effort. Looks fine. :)

The base branch was changed.