Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Documentation and configuration files for a fully local setup #262

Open
adamdbrw opened this issue Oct 2, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Documentation and configuration files for a fully local setup #262

adamdbrw opened this issue Oct 2, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@adamdbrw
Copy link
Member

adamdbrw commented Oct 2, 2024

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
While cloud-hosted large models provide performance that cannot me matched locally due to infrastructure cost or the model unavailability, having this kind of external connectivity requirement for robots can be a no-go for some applications. Even though it is possible, it is currently not clear how to make RAI work fully locally, and what are its platform requirements.

Local does not necessarily mean on-board, as the possibilities would be too limiting at the moment.

Describe the solution you'd like
Documentation pages and ready configuration files for a fully local RAI setup, clearly stating requirements for GPU memory and other platform parameters. If this depends on a selection of models, give numbers for a few configurations that makes sense and cover lower, mid, and higher end. Indicate the trade-offs such as lower task performance overall.

Look at packages such as llama_ros, whether they can be directly used with the project.

Describe alternatives you've considered
There is no alternative that resolves the problem.

Additional context
See https://github.com/mgonzs13/llama_ros

@adamdbrw adamdbrw added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant