Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rustc wanted features & bugfixes #355

Open
30 of 52 tasks
ojeda opened this issue Jun 4, 2021 · 0 comments
Open
30 of 52 tasks

rustc wanted features & bugfixes #355

ojeda opened this issue Jun 4, 2021 · 0 comments
Labels
meta Meta issue. • toolchain Related to `rustc`, `bindgen`, `rustdoc`, LLVM, Clippy...

Comments

@ojeda
Copy link
Member

ojeda commented Jun 4, 2021

Note: there is the "A-rust-for-linux" label in the rust repository: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/labels/A-rust-for-linux.

Features that we would like to see

Required (we almost certainly want them)

Nice to have (not critical, we could workaround if needed, etc.)

Low priority (we will likely not use them in the end)

  • --check mode / --emit=check.
    • Like cargo check, but for rustc.
    • cargo check appears to do --emit=dep-info,metadata, but that would not be needed for the leaves.
    • Currently, the best approximation appears to be --emit=metadata, but it would be nice to have a way that reduces the work to the minimum, at least avoiding to emit the metadata and temporaries.
    • --emit=metadata=/dev/null does not appear to work due to the generated temporaries (and -Ztemps-dir does not seem to change that).
    • Use case: some tests (e.g. in upstream Rust: the warning-free builds of core and alloc under no_global_oom_handling in rustc) and faster development (it could also be part of a dev-mode in the kernel, which could include other changes like disabling the missing documentation warning).
    • From: Add test for warning-free builds of core under no_global_oom_handling rust-lang/rust#110652.

Done (stabilized, fixed, not needed anymore, etc.)


Bugs that we would like to see fixed

Required (we almost certainly want them)

Nice to have (probably not critical, we could workaround if needed, etc.)

Low priority (we will likely not use them in the end)

Done (stabilized, fixed, or not needed anymore, etc.)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
meta Meta issue. • toolchain Related to `rustc`, `bindgen`, `rustdoc`, LLVM, Clippy...
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant