Feat: add option to set detail of coverage information + method level instruction coverage #88
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Hi @lacinoire The PR looks great to me and can be merged. |
lacinoire
force-pushed
the
expressive-instruction-coverage
branch
from
c5cc0fb to
7e5810b
Compare
|
I cherry picked the last commit and now there are no overlaps with #87 anymore 🙂 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
(includes / dependent on #87)
Good afternoon 😊
For Test Cube I needed more detailed coverage information, specifically the instruction coverage reported per method.
I adapted my modifications to fit @martinezmatias new coverage transformers and added an option to specify which coverage transformer should be used.
Included a test for the new method-detailed coverage and a more general test to help me understand the comparison of two coverages.