Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Enhancement] refactor array_map's implementation #51244

Merged
merged 17 commits into from
Oct 1, 2024

Conversation

silverbullet233
Copy link
Contributor

@silverbullet233 silverbullet233 commented Sep 21, 2024

Why I'm doing:

What I'm doing:

Fixes #issue

What type of PR is this:

  • BugFix
  • Feature
  • Enhancement
  • Refactor
  • UT
  • Doc
  • Tool

Does this PR entail a change in behavior?

  • Yes, this PR will result in a change in behavior.
  • No, this PR will not result in a change in behavior.

If yes, please specify the type of change:

  • Interface/UI changes: syntax, type conversion, expression evaluation, display information
  • Parameter changes: default values, similar parameters but with different default values
  • Policy changes: use new policy to replace old one, functionality automatically enabled
  • Feature removed
  • Miscellaneous: upgrade & downgrade compatibility, etc.

Checklist:

  • I have added test cases for my bug fix or my new feature
  • This pr needs user documentation (for new or modified features or behaviors)
    • I have added documentation for my new feature or new function
  • This is a backport pr

Bugfix cherry-pick branch check:

  • I have checked the version labels which the pr will be auto-backported to the target branch
    • 3.3
    • 3.2
    • 3.1
    • 3.0
    • 2.5

@silverbullet233 silverbullet233 requested a review from a team as a code owner September 21, 2024 11:30
@silverbullet233 silverbullet233 changed the title [WIP] refactor array_Map [WIP] refactor array_map Sep 21, 2024
@silverbullet233 silverbullet233 changed the title [WIP] refactor array_map [Enhancement] refactor array_map's implementation Sep 23, 2024
@silverbullet233 silverbullet233 force-pushed the refactor_array_map branch 2 times, most recently from c9e8a1a to 4d92ff8 Compare September 26, 2024 06:58
trueeyu
trueeyu previously approved these changes Sep 26, 2024
trueeyu
trueeyu previously approved these changes Sep 26, 2024
LiShuMing
LiShuMing previously approved these changes Sep 27, 2024
satanson
satanson previously approved these changes Sep 27, 2024
be/src/column/array_column.cpp Show resolved Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: silverbullet233 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: silverbullet233 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: silverbullet233 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: silverbullet233 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: silverbullet233 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: silverbullet233 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: silverbullet233 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: silverbullet233 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: silverbullet233 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: silverbullet233 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: silverbullet233 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: silverbullet233 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: silverbullet233 <[email protected]>
Copy link

[Java-Extensions Incremental Coverage Report]

pass : 0 / 0 (0%)

Copy link

[FE Incremental Coverage Report]

pass : 0 / 0 (0%)

Copy link

[BE Incremental Coverage Report]

pass : 323 / 354 (91.24%)

file detail

path covered_line new_line coverage not_covered_line_detail
🔵 be/src/column/nullable_column.h 0 1 00.00% [85]
🔵 be/src/column/const_column.h 0 1 00.00% [52]
🔵 be/src/column/array_column.h 0 1 00.00% [148]
🔵 be/src/exprs/lambda_function.cpp 77 86 89.53% [228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 235, 236, 237]
🔵 be/src/exprs/array_map_expr.cpp 186 204 91.18% [87, 174, 214, 215, 227, 267, 329, 330, 331, 363, 364, 365, 366, 367, 368, 370, 371, 372]
🔵 be/src/column/array_column.cpp 44 45 97.78% [688]
🔵 be/src/exprs/literal.h 1 1 100.00% []
🔵 be/src/exprs/map_apply_expr.cpp 2 2 100.00% []
🔵 be/src/column/chunk.cpp 1 1 100.00% []
🔵 be/src/exprs/lambda_function.h 9 9 100.00% []
🔵 be/src/column/column.cpp 1 1 100.00% []
🔵 be/src/exprs/expr.h 2 2 100.00% []

@silverbullet233 silverbullet233 merged commit e9eedcd into StarRocks:main Oct 1, 2024
44 checks passed
@silverbullet233 silverbullet233 deleted the refactor_array_map branch October 1, 2024 16:35
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 1, 2024

@Mergifyio backport branch-3.3

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the 3.3 label Oct 1, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 1, 2024

@Mergifyio backport branch-3.2

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the 3.2 label Oct 1, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Oct 1, 2024

backport branch-3.3

✅ Backports have been created

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Oct 1, 2024

backport branch-3.2

✅ Backports have been created

mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 1, 2024
Signed-off-by: silverbullet233 <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit e9eedcd)

# Conflicts:
#	be/src/column/column.cpp
#	be/src/exprs/literal.h
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 1, 2024
Signed-off-by: silverbullet233 <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit e9eedcd)

# Conflicts:
#	be/src/column/column.cpp
#	be/src/exprs/expr.h
#	be/src/exprs/literal.h
silverbullet233 added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 2, 2024
…51574)

Signed-off-by: silverbullet233 <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: eyes_on_me <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: silverbullet233 <[email protected]>
@silverbullet233 silverbullet233 mentioned this pull request Oct 8, 2024
24 tasks
silverbullet233 added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2024
…51575)

Signed-off-by: silverbullet233 <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: eyes_on_me <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: silverbullet233 <[email protected]>
renzhimin7 pushed a commit to renzhimin7/starrocks that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants