Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Typos. Typos. Typos #2387

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 24, 2024
Merged

Typos. Typos. Typos #2387

merged 3 commits into from
Jul 24, 2024

Conversation

engelhartrueben
Copy link
Collaborator

@engelhartrueben engelhartrueben commented Jul 24, 2024

Fixes # (issue)

Not me finding every Typo in the documentation in order to cover up my own plethora of typos.

Description

Used a spell checker plug-in to find all the typos in the docs/ folder.

Asynchronous is hard to spell.

Checklist:

  • I have manually tested my changes on desktop and mobile
  • The test suite passes locally with my changes
  • If my change is a UI change, I have attached a screenshot to the description section of this pull request
  • My change is 300 lines of code or less, or has a documented reason in the description why it’s longer
  • I have made any necessary changes to the documentation
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • My PR is labeled [WIP] if it is in progress

@engelhartrueben engelhartrueben requested a review from mau11 July 24, 2024 15:32
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ not in needsMessage but have replies/conversations. This is useful for 'split'
one group of texters sends initial texts and then another group does the second.

Also needed for organizing split assignments would be the `outbound-unassign` message handler which
unassigns messages upon initial send (so they can be 'taken' by the vetted texters.
unassigned messages upon initial send (so they can be 'taken' by the vetted texters.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it caught this one by mistake

@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ You're also not likely to encounter many people with prior experience specifical
There are lots of tech industry people interested in politics. They really want to work with you.
But tech skills and tech costs vary wildly. You can easily spend $0, $100, $1000, $10,000 for the same work and functionality. Make candidates compete for your business so you can drive down the cost of your project, and make sure the person you bring on is the right fit for your org.

Please, please, please don't just hire your friends, or someone who looks like a tech person who happens to be sitting 100 ft from you in your coworking space when you realize you need a website. Most software contracting projects experience a 50% failure rate due to lack of skill fit and contractor capacity. Publish your job publicly and run a competitive process to find a person to ensure that you're getting the right person with the right skills and right availability for your job.
Please, please, please don't just hire your friends, or someone who looks like a tech person who happens to be sitting 100 ft from you in your work space when you realize you need a website. Most software contracting projects experience a 50% failure rate due to lack of skill fit and contractor capacity. Publish your job publicly and run a competitive process to find a person to ensure that you're getting the right person with the right skills and right availability for your job.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this one too

Copy link
Member

@mau11 mau11 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

great idea to run this!

@engelhartrueben engelhartrueben merged commit 16a0f1b into stage-main-14.1 Jul 24, 2024
17 checks passed
@engelhartrueben engelhartrueben deleted the re/typos branch July 24, 2024 17:40
@engelhartrueben engelhartrueben mentioned this pull request Sep 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: 14.1
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants