-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: add non-preemptive SJF scheduling #2801
feat: add non-preemptive SJF scheduling #2801
Conversation
|
https://github.com/TheAlgorithms/C-Plus-Plus/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#Commit-Guidelines |
@realstealthninja I have done the following |
@realstealthninja Could you please review the PR ? And could the hacktober label be put ? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please move this algorithm to cpu_scheduling/ since that seems appropriate
Co-authored-by: realstealthninja <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: realstealthninja <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: realstealthninja <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: realstealthninja <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: realstealthninja <[email protected]>
I have done the necessary changes. The test function will generate 10 different testcases in which it will print the before and after the SJF scheduling. @realstealthninja Kindly review the PR and please accept it.
…rikumar/C-Plus-Plus into LakshmiSrikumar-patch-1
I have done the necessary changes.
@realstealthninja Kindly review the PR and please accept it. |
Co-authored-by: realstealthninja <[email protected]>
@realstealthninja could you please approve the repo ? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Lgtm!
The approved label is not added |
the approved label is not added and the hacktober has not accepted the
repo. Could you tell why ?
…On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 9:07 PM realstealthninja ***@***.***> wrote:
***@***.**** approved this pull request.
Lgtm!
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#2801 (review)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BBVMSXJBSFNZY5AOPNB33ZTZ37KTDAVCNFSM6AAAAABPUQSYHKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43YUDVNRWFEZLROVSXG5CSMV3GSZLXHMZDGNZVGYYTINZTGE>
.
You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
|
I'm very sorry. I've added it now! ❤️ thanks again for contributing |
Description of Change
Non pre-emptive SJF Scheduling algorithm
Added C++ implementation of SJF scheduling algorithm in the directory cpu_scheduling/
Checklist
Notes: