This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 1, 2023. It is now read-only.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Wqp fixes #58
Wqp fixes #58
Changes from 5 commits
4b69c6c
6ecd1d3
2c8e5e7
3ed9c4c
a360d90
33a648a
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What is the grouping structure for
dat_reduced
? You could consider moving theungroup()
step to line 95 to avoid repeating that step in line 96 and then again in line 109.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Similar to my comment above, I wonder about ungrouping the data frame earlier on in the pipeline. Is it expected that
'5_data_munge/out/wqp_data_streams.rds.ind'
has some grouping structure that should be maintained?This is a minor formatting suggestion and I don't expect it to change the output of the pipeline, so feel free to take or leave this suggestion.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
😢
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice, way to recover this info!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For posterity:
2115448 observations with mismatching start/end dates were recovered by extracting collection dates from comments
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Wow, that number is higher than I was expecting!