You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the USA, mortgage-backed securities trading is made practical by a corporation called MERS: Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.. MERS is registered with county records offices as the mortgage holder, so that no public records actually change when a mortgage-backed security is traded. The obligations of the property owner to make mortgage payments, and the interests of the securities owner, are covered in confidential documents that are not filed with the county.
A common ownership requirement for First-Party Sets would likely result in the formation of a MERS-like entity for web properties, call it "WERS". This organization would be able to afford to meet the requirements of UA Policy, publicly register and represent a valid First Party Set owner as the owner of each domain in the set, and enter into confidential agreements with the individuals or entities that actually make decisions about handling of user data collected on each participating site. Thanks to scale and connections, WERS will be better at complying with UA Policy than small multi-domain publishers and brands that do not use WERS, especially those located in countries where a browser has users but not lawyers who understand how to obtain and check corporate ownership records.
First-Party Sets would clearly require common privacy policy, data stewardship policies, and user-understandable brand identity. An ownership requirement would add additional record-keeping and legal expenses for sites and user agents without improving anything for users.
* Remove reference to Do Not Track
* Add a source and definition of "controller"
* Remove language on ownership, replace with more consistent mentions of "controller"
* Mention that common branding should apply to users of assistive technologies
Ownership verification is complex, does not add enforceable protections for users beyond the common controller requirement, and is likely to create costs and risks for some sites that would make it hard to use this feature.
Refs: WICG#14WICG#18WICG#20WICG#49WICG#55
In the USA, mortgage-backed securities trading is made practical by a corporation called MERS: Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.. MERS is registered with county records offices as the mortgage holder, so that no public records actually change when a mortgage-backed security is traded. The obligations of the property owner to make mortgage payments, and the interests of the securities owner, are covered in confidential documents that are not filed with the county.
A common ownership requirement for First-Party Sets would likely result in the formation of a MERS-like entity for web properties, call it "WERS". This organization would be able to afford to meet the requirements of UA Policy, publicly register and represent a valid First Party Set owner as the owner of each domain in the set, and enter into confidential agreements with the individuals or entities that actually make decisions about handling of user data collected on each participating site. Thanks to scale and connections, WERS will be better at complying with UA Policy than small multi-domain publishers and brands that do not use WERS, especially those located in countries where a browser has users but not lawyers who understand how to obtain and check corporate ownership records.
First-Party Sets would clearly require common privacy policy, data stewardship policies, and user-understandable brand identity. An ownership requirement would add additional record-keeping and legal expenses for sites and user agents without improving anything for users.
Related: #48 #75
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: