Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: add missing ulem package #383

Conversation

rpoisel
Copy link

@rpoisel rpoisel commented Apr 17, 2024

The ulem package has been missing in the LaTeX template. It is mentioned in the documentation though.

Therefore, it is now added to allow for rendering strike-through text.

PS: thanks for this great template. I like it a lot!

@rpoisel rpoisel force-pushed the fix-add-missing-ulem-package branch 3 times, most recently from b8fa1c9 to b8027c1 Compare May 31, 2024 19:52
@rpoisel rpoisel force-pushed the fix-add-missing-ulem-package branch from b8027c1 to 43ce976 Compare November 10, 2024 21:58
@Wandmalfarbe
Copy link
Owner

Wandmalfarbe commented Jan 11, 2025

The usage of ulem for strike-through text has been removed from the pandoc default template in jgm/pandoc@144bf90 (see jgm/pandoc#8411).

The upstream change was merged into Eisvogel here c255d9d and released with version 2.4.2.

I will have to remove the mentioned package from the documentation in the README (see #410). Thanks for reminding me!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants