[spec] Fix grammar for fractions #1178
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
binji
approved these changes
Apr 20, 2020
document/core/text/values.rst
Outdated
| @@ -105,11 +103,11 @@ Floating-Point | |||
| p{:}\Tnum~\text{.}~q{:}\Tfrac~(\text{E}~|~\text{e})~{\pm}{:}\Tsign~e{:}\Tnum | |||
| &\Rightarrow& (p+q)\cdot 10^{\pm e} \\ | |||
| \production{hexadecimal floating-point number} & \Thexfloat &::=& | |||
| \text{0x}~p{:}\Thexnum | |||
| \text{0x}~p{:}\Thexnum~\text{.} | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The dot should be optional here too?
| &\Rightarrow& p \\ &&|& | ||
| \text{0x}~p{:}\Thexnum~\text{.}~q{:}\Thexfrac | ||
| &\Rightarrow& p+q \\ &&|& | ||
| \text{0x}~p{:}\Thexnum~(\text{P}~|~\text{p})~{\pm}{:}\Tsign~e{:}\Tnum | ||
| \text{0x}~p{:}\Thexnum~\text{.}^?~(\text{P}~|~\text{p})~{\pm}{:}\Tsign~e{:}\Tnum |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Same change for decimal floats above? (line 101)
gumb0
pushed a commit
to wasmx/wasm-spec
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 18, 2020
gumb0
pushed a commit
to wasmx/wasm-spec
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 21, 2020
rossberg
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 11, 2021
* Upgrade to latest Sphinx release (2.4.4) (#1171) Fixes #1157 * Support 4GB of memory both in initial and max. * [interpreter] Strictify and specify .bin.wast format (#1173) * Merge nontrapping-float-to-int proposal into spec (#1143) See the non-trapping-float-to-int-conversions proposal here: https://github.com/WebAssembly/nontrapping-float-to-int-conversions * Merge sign-extension-ops proposal into spec (#1144) See the sign-extension-ops proposal here: https://github.com/WebAssembly/sign-extension-ops This PR is built on top of #1143 (merge nontrapping-float-to-int). * Merge multi-value proposal into spec (#1145) See the multi-value proposal here: https://github.com/WebAssembly/multi-value This PR is built on top of the following PRs: * #1143 (merge nontrapping-float-to-int) * #1144 (merge sign-extension-ops) * [interpreter] Remove junk in README * [interpreter] Remove junk in README * [spec] Fix grammar for fractions (#1178) * [spec] Add missing i64.extend32_s syntax (#1179) * [js-api][web-api] Fix some markup errors. * Add a README to the proposals directory. * Add more address overflow tests (#1188) There are already tests for effective address overflow, but those have a large value baked into the offset. These tests all use `1` as the immediate offset, and use `-1` for the address on the stack, which may be compiled differently. * Add a test for non-treelike behavior of stack (#961) We've recently found a bug in a WebAssembly library we've been working with where we're mapping WebAssembly to a tree-like IR internally. The way we parse into this representation, however, has a bug when the function isn't itself tree-like but rather exibits properties that exploit a stack machine. For example this isn't so straightforward to represent in a tree-like fashion: (import "" "a" (func $foo)) (import "" "b" (func $foo (result i32))) (func (result i32) call $b call $b call $a i32.xor) The extra `call $a` in the middle is valid `WebAssembly` but needs special treatment when converting to a more tree-like IR format. I figured it'd be good to ensure there's a spec test covering this case as we currently pass the suite of spec tests but still contain this bug! * [js-api] Various editorial improvements. * [js-api] Replace pseudo-ASCII characters by normal ones. This also required disambiguating the references to "module", as there are now two definitions by that name. * [js-api] Improve prose in 'run a host function'. * [js-api] Improve some of the multi-value prose. * Synchronize js-api tests. * Add script to synchronize js-api tests. Co-authored-by: Ng Zhi An <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Alon Zakai <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Ben Smith <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Ms2ger <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Alex Crichton <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes WebAssembly/design#1337.