Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mark Table of Contents block as experimental using block.json flag. #40905

Merged

Conversation

ZebulanStanphill
Copy link
Member

What?

This PR fixes a minor regression, namely that the Table of Contents is no longer marked as experimental after the merge of #40655.

Why?

The block was marked as experimental using the old means, but now that #40655 was merged, it needs to use the new block.json method.

How?

This PR simply adds the __experimental flag to the block.json.

@ZebulanStanphill ZebulanStanphill added [Type] Task Issues or PRs that have been broken down into an individual action to take [Block] Table of contents (experimental) Affects the Table of contents Block labels May 7, 2022
@ZebulanStanphill ZebulanStanphill force-pushed the update/mark-table-of-contents-as-experimental-again branch from 9e1aab2 to 936de6a Compare May 8, 2022 15:43
Copy link
Member

@gziolo gziolo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great catch, thank you!

@ZebulanStanphill ZebulanStanphill merged commit fa19c08 into trunk May 8, 2022
@ZebulanStanphill ZebulanStanphill deleted the update/mark-table-of-contents-as-experimental-again branch May 8, 2022 17:47
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the Gutenberg 13.3 milestone May 8, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
[Block] Table of contents (experimental) Affects the Table of contents Block [Type] Task Issues or PRs that have been broken down into an individual action to take
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants