-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Paste Handler: Try to fix pasting text with formatting #63779
Conversation
Size Change: +369 B (+0.02%) Total Size: 1.77 MB
ℹ️ View Unchanged
|
@ellatrix It appears to pass all tests. Could removing this early return cause any problems? |
@@ -27,12 +27,6 @@ export default ( props ) => ( element ) => { | |||
pastePlainText, | |||
} = props.current; | |||
|
|||
// The event listener is attached to the window, so we need to check if | |||
// the target is the element. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this is a valid comment. I probably thought the target would be a focusable element and always the wrapper, but turns out not. Maybe change it to:
! element.contains( event.target )
To make sure we only catch paste within the container.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Btw, there's a similar early return in enter.js
. I wonder if that's causing any bugs?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
! element.contains( event.target )
I have confirmed that this approach also works correctly. After a bit of debugging, it appears that element.target
is sometimes an inner element, rather than the focusable element itself.
Btw, there's a similar early return in
enter.js
. I wonder if that's causing any bugs?
I've tried debugging close to this code, and as far as I've tested, element.target
is always the focusable element itself, so it doesn't seem to be causing any kind of bug.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, that's super odd.
The following accounts have interacted with this PR and/or linked issues. I will continue to update these lists as activity occurs. You can also manually ask me to refresh this list by adding the If you're merging code through a pull request on GitHub, copy and paste the following into the bottom of the merge commit message.
To understand the WordPress project's expectations around crediting contributors, please review the Contributor Attribution page in the Core Handbook. |
Should we add a small e2e test so this doesn't regress in the next refactor? |
bdc7ecf
to
92d5699
Compare
I've added an e2e test. This test is expected to fail on trunk, but for some reason it passes when I run the e2e tests. However, if I run this test manually on trunk, it fails as expected. I don't understand why it passes when I run it as an e2e test 🤔 Debugging e2e test on trunkThe test passes, but this is unexpected. Post Content: <!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p><strong>testtest</strong></p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph --> 8c88d2c810e674a68de73da91e8cdd64.mp4Manual test on trunkThe test fails, which is expected. Post Content: <!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p><strong>test</strong>test</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph --> 9f6df1e6d2c36ed54d2079368e407606.mp4 |
await pageUtils.pressKeys( 'primary+a' ); | ||
await pageUtils.pressKeys( 'primary+b' ); | ||
await pageUtils.pressKeys( 'primary+c' ); | ||
await page.keyboard.press( 'ArrowRight' ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think you'll need to make sure the caret is within the bold format?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Strangely, the problem does not occur inside formatted text, but only occurs when you move the caret outside the formatted text and paste:
343f6d41d1e628a05a987ade8f294824.mp4
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To trigger the link behaviour, you'd need to select text within the format?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd for example select a letter within the text format (to make sure the test is stable and selection boundaries are within the format), then paste the link on the uncollapsed selection
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I tried copying letters within the formatted text and the e2e test still passed on trunk 😅 Of course, the test is expected to fail on trunk.
8145cb965a0b29fd21526da281f67a31.mp4
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But you're not pasting a link?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, I see what you mean.
#63434 reports two issues:
- If the text is formatted, highlighting and adding the link via paste doesn't work
- If the copied text contains formatted text at the end, pasting the copied text outside the formatted text removes the formatting
This PR solves both problems, but the E2E test I added is for the second problem. Does this mean I should write a test for the first problem?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I didn't see the second problem, I only knew about the first problem from the PR description. Sure, if it's easier to write a PR for.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There may be slight differences with how paste is emulated that make it pass.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I updated the e2e test to paste the link into the formatted text. But for some reason, this test still passes on trunk as well 😅
37a8220
to
765cca1
Compare
765cca1
to
098b184
Compare
098b184
to
33a2a73
Compare
The problem this PR is trying to solve seems to have been fixed as a result of #63671, which allows multiple selections on touch devices. Since #63671 is an enhancement, I don't think it can be backported to WP6.6.2 as is. If we want to backport just the paste fix to WP6.6.2, do we need to manually backport just this code to the WP6.6 branch? Pinging @hellofromtonya @vcanales for visibility |
Also noting that #63671 is from 2019. As it's before 6.6 and is an enhancement, I agree with you @t-hamano that it cannot be included in the 6.6 minor cycle. That said, if there's a specific bug introduced during the 6.6 cycle of which a smaller subset of this PR directly fixes the bug, then it could potentially and cautiously be considered. Why caution? Sometimes an enhancement indirectly fixes bugs. Though it may fix bugs, it's still introducing new functionality or feature. |
Sorry for the late reply. Just to be sure we're on the same page, I'd like to provide a brief summary.
If you have any questions, please let me know, and I'd be happy to help with any backports needed. Either way, this PR is no longer needed for the trunk branch so I will close it. |
} ) => { | ||
await editor.insertBlock( { | ||
name: 'core/paragraph', | ||
attributes: { content: 'test' }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Perhaps it could start with bolded text to reduce the complexity of the test?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Indeed, I simplified it with 9a56955
This PR has a bit of a complicated history, so here's a summary of why a backport to WP 6.7 is needed:
|
* Paste Handler: Try to fix pasting text with formatting * Refactor e2e test * Simplify e2e test Co-authored-by: t-hamano <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: ellatrix <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: hellofromtonya <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: ndiego <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: rfischmann <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: bph <[email protected]>
I just cherry-picked this PR to the wp/6.7 branch to get it included in the next release: 7d65e11 |
Fixes #63434
What?
This PR fixes an issue where copying and pasting text that contains inline formatting would strip the formatting from the pasted text.
Why?
I'm not sure what the root cause is, but it seems the problem occurs when the copied text contains formatted text at the end.
Also, when pasting multiple times, the formatted text seems to be pasted correctly either the odd or even number of times.
How?
Removed the early return that was causing the problem.
We'll review what tests fail to ensure this doesn't introduce any unintended regressions.
Testing Instructions
Screenshots or screencast
Before
9a2c3325579aa4d1685bb79e17c29cc5.mp4
After
6069e56a8ffe1bd049208c9a9681c728.mp4