-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update modal animation #64580
Merged
Merged
Update modal animation #64580
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
46e8c70
WIP
jameskoster 4313a0d
Merge branch 'trunk' into update/modal-animation
jameskoster 2972e73
Simplify
jameskoster e6d6d77
Remove blur
jameskoster e050d9a
Update changelog
jameskoster a1f7a62
Adjust animation
jameskoster bbac883
Rebase
jameskoster 0f3327c
duration
jameskoster 2510624
overlay easing
jameskoster 30773e4
Merge branch 'trunk' into update/modal-animation
jameskoster File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The way this mixin is defined has a few issues that we should solve:
@wordpress/edit-post
package, while it's actually defined in the@wordpress/base-styles
package;edit-post__fade-in-animation
animation keyframes are defined (twice) in separate packages: here and here. That is a potential issue in itself, since:@wordpress/base-styles
doesn't need to load the@wordpress/edit-site
or@wordpress/edit-post
packages, then the animation will not work (since it's not defined in@wordpress/base-stlyles
)The result is that, currently, the
Modal
component in@wordpress/components
is consuming a SCSS mixin from@wordpress/base-styles
(which is confusingly prefixed with the name of another package), but it needs for either the@wordpress/edit-site
or the@wordpress/edit-post
packages to be loaded too. This creates an implicit circular dependency that we should break.Looking at WPDirectory, it looks like the
edit-post__fade-in-animation
mixin is used by third-party developers, and therefore we can't really rename it.But we can still move the
@keyframes
definitions in the same file as the mixin, and delete the duplicate definitions in other packages — this will remove implicit circular dependencies, and prevent unexpected behaviors caused by the keyframes potentially having different definitions.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Trying out the approach suggested above as part of #65203 (comment)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Extracted to #65377