Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Rust crate backtrace to 0.3.71 #1833

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 1, 2024
Merged

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented May 1, 2024

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
backtrace dependencies patch 0.3 -> 0.3.71

Release Notes

rust-lang/backtrace-rs (backtrace)

v0.3.71

Compare Source

This is mostly CI changes, with a very mild bump to our effective cc crate version recorded, and a small modification to a previous changeset to allow backtrace to run at its current checked-in MSRV on Windows. Sorry about that! We will be getting 0.3.70 yanked shortly.

What's Changed
New Contributors

Full Changelog: rust-lang/backtrace-rs@0.3.70...0.3.71

v0.3.70

Compare Source

New API
Platform Support

We added support for new platforms in this release!

Windows
SGX

Thanks to

Internals

We did a bunch more work on our CI and internal cleanups

New Contributors

Full Changelog: rust-lang/backtrace-rs@0.3.69...0.3.70

v0.3.69

Compare Source

Thank you everyone for contributing to a very nice release!

Tracking Binary Size

As backtrace-rs is compiled into every single Rust program, we have begun tracking its binary size in order to find ways to reduce its impact on programs that only minimally use backtraces over time. This change is mostly relevant to this crate's CI, and has been implemented by @​Kobzol and @​detly over PRs #​542, #​544, #​546, and #​550!

Platform-Specific Fixes

As usual, the majority of PRs for this release only affect 1 or 2 platforms. Technically, even the binary-size tracking is only implemented to track binary size on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.

fuchsia

Backtraces for Fuchsia will now uses extended symbolization thanks to @​liudangyi in https://github.com/rust-lang/backtrace-rs/pull/559

unix (with procfs)

Many Unix-y platforms support /proc, including Linux and FreeBSD, but not OpenBSD. For those which do, backtrace uses /proc/self/maps to assist in recovering the trace. We did not parse the output of /proc/self/maps in a way that accounted for the fact that it may have spaces in path names, but this was fixed thanks to @​MasonRemaley in https://github.com/rust-lang/backtrace-rs/pull/553

windows-msvc

Some changes that should help binary size specifically on Windows MSVC targets, or at least compile times, have already been implemented, thanks to @​klensy in https://github.com/rust-lang/backtrace-rs/pull/543 omitting compiling-in ELF backtrace capabilities. We don't have full binary size tracking for all major supported operating systems yet, so we believe this is worth 30KiB but that's more of an estimate than hard stats.

Dependency Management
New Contributors

Full Changelog: rust-lang/backtrace-rs@0.3.68...0.3.69

v0.3.68

Compare Source

A bunch of behind-the-scenes work on upgrading CI has finally got things to a place where we can do confident releases again, so hopefully the next backtrace version will not take 6 months! Thanks to everyone who contributed to that! Most of the user-facing changes are about dependency updates and consequent improved platform compatibility, including with split DWARF. A few new functions on BacktraceFmt should also make it easier to inject additional text into backtrace's output.

New Contributors

Full Changelog: rust-lang/backtrace-rs@0.3.67...0.3.68


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

Copy link
Contributor Author

renovate bot commented May 1, 2024

⚠ Artifact update problem

Renovate failed to update an artifact related to this branch. You probably do not want to merge this PR as-is.

♻ Renovate will retry this branch, including artifacts, only when one of the following happens:

  • any of the package files in this branch needs updating, or
  • the branch becomes conflicted, or
  • you click the rebase/retry checkbox if found above, or
  • you rename this PR's title to start with "rebase!" to trigger it manually

The artifact failure details are included below:

File name: Cargo.lock
Command failed: cargo update --config net.git-fetch-with-cli=true --manifest-path packages/next-swc/crates/napi/Cargo.toml --workspace
error: duplicate key `semver` in table `workspace.dependencies`
   --> Cargo.toml:125:1
    |
125 | semver = "1.0.19"
    | ^
    |
error: error inheriting `dhat` from workspace root manifest's `workspace.dependencies.dhat`

Copy link

stackblitz bot commented May 1, 2024

Review PR in StackBlitz Codeflow Run & review this pull request in StackBlitz Codeflow.

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented May 1, 2024

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 41ba5c2

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit 425b12a into canary May 1, 2024
1 of 2 checks passed
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot deleted the renovate/backtrace-0.x branch May 1, 2024 09:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants