Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Proposed 0.80.0-rc3 #2232

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Sep 25, 2017
Merged

Proposed 0.80.0-rc3 #2232

merged 8 commits into from
Sep 25, 2017

Conversation

nbougalis
Copy link
Contributor

@nbougalis nbougalis commented Sep 23, 2017

Merges 0.70.2 and PRs #2212, #2221, #2224 and #2228.

ximinez and others added 8 commits September 21, 2017 15:02
* If the transaction can't be queued, recover to the open ledger once,
  and drop it on the next attempt.
* New result codes for transactions that can not queue.
* Add minimum queue size.
* Remove the obsolete and incorrect SF_RETRY flag.
* fix #2215
Introduce "fix1523" which corrects a minor technical flaw with
the original implementation of the escrow feature.

When creating an escrow, the entry would only be tracked in the
owner directory of the sender; as a result, an escrow recipient
would not be able to detect incoming escrows without monitoring
the ledger in real-time for transactions of interest or without
the sender communicating this information out of band.

With the fix in place, escrows where the recipient differs from
the sender will be listed in the recipient's owner directory as
well.
Switches the default behavior of Consensus to use roundCloseTime instead of
effCloseTime. effCloseTime is still used when accepting the consensus ledger to
ensure the consensus close time comes after the parent ledger close time. This
change eliminates an edge case in which peers could reach agreement on the close
time, but end up generating ledgers with different close times.
@nbougalis nbougalis merged commit 3e5490e into XRPLF:develop Sep 25, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants