-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Clarify definition of "network health." #4729
Changes from 1 commit
73b0ecf
2237f1d
e7841e7
a5e12e0
8d60850
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -190,9 +190,17 @@ lower) fee to get into the same position as a reference transaction. | |
|
||
### Consensus Health | ||
|
||
For consensus to be considered healthy, the consensus process must take | ||
less than 5 seconds. This time limit was chosen based on observed past | ||
behavior of the network. Note that this is not necessarily the time between | ||
For consensus to be considered healthy, the peers on the network | ||
should largely remain in sync with one another. It is particularly | ||
important for the validators to remain in sync, because they must | ||
be in sync to participate in consensus. Another factor to consider is | ||
the duration of the consensus process itself. This generally takes | ||
under 5 seconds on the main network. This is based on historical | ||
observations. However, some factors, such as transactions volumes, | ||
can increase consensus duration. This is because rippled performs | ||
more work as transaction volume increases. Under sufficient load this | ||
tends to increase consensus duration. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Would add "time" here "Under sufficient load this time tends to ...", because we refer to "the time" in the sentence below which is now pushed far from the reference to consensus duration time. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Duration is more precise, though "time" as used here means duration among other things. So duration is more appropriate here and I changed other instances of "time" to reflect that. |
||
Note that this is not necessarily the time between | ||
ledger closings, as consensus usually starts some amount of time after | ||
a ledger opens. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Should this sentence be moved up ? It seems disconnected here. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I just removed the sentence entirely. It's not a useful detail here. |
||
|
||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would avoid repeated "in sync" and instead use "... validators to remain in sync in order to participate in consensus."