-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Modeling Contracts pc:actualPrice, pc:agreedPrice and pc:estimatedPrice #48
Comments
We fixed this issue in the mapping spreadsheet and in our model so the "contract_initial_value_cost_eur" is mapped only by pc:estimatedPrice |
Related: YourDataStories/harvesters#16 |
Currently we mapped contract_initial_value_cost_eur to the pc:estimatedPrice and the contract_contract_value_cost_eur to pc:agreedPrice as agreed. |
@giorgosvaf could you please verify the changes? |
Please provide metadata of a specific contract and the respective SPARQL query from your pilot 3 graph in order to verify the mapping. |
In the following document (sheet DataModel) you use the properties pc:actualPrice, pc:agreedPrice and pc:estimatedPrice, but you have made the mapping with two metadata values.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/14YkWa6_PM8BtfnoWGQmMZacYIwmvfkdqKG6fzML0dic/edit#gid=1232340869
For example you use both pc:actualPrice & pc:estimatedPrice for "contract_initial_value_cost_eur" metadata value.
So first of all you have to make the correct mapping to metadata.
But, the data you retrieve are Tenders actually, so you can use just pc:estimatedPrice, because according to public contracts specification for Tenders this is the most appropriate property.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: