-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 224
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
FEAT: Enhance API Deployment Validation to Return 4xx Instead of 500 for Errors #890
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…r execution requests
pk-zipstack
requested review from
muhammad-ali-e,
chandrasekharan-zipstack and
a team
December 11, 2024 19:20
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
Signed-off-by: Praveen Kumar <[email protected]>
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
chandrasekharan-zipstack
requested changes
Dec 12, 2024
Co-authored-by: Chandrasekharan M <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Praveen Kumar <[email protected]>
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
Signed-off-by: Praveen Kumar <[email protected]>
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
Co-authored-by: Chandrasekharan M <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Praveen Kumar <[email protected]>
chandrasekharan-zipstack
approved these changes
Dec 16, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM - make sure to resolve conflicts @pk-zipstack
Co-authored-by: Chandrasekharan M <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Praveen Kumar <[email protected]>
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
|
Quality Gate passedIssues Measures |
Deepak-Kesavan
approved these changes
Dec 16, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What
WorkflowHelper
to handle execution errors: Added explicit exception handling for non-existentexecution_id
serializers.py
: Added validation forexecution_id
to ensure it adheres to a valid UUID format.api_deployment_views.py
:exceptions.py
:ExecutionDoesNotExistError
Why
execution_id
is invalid or doesn't exist in the database.How
serializers.py
:execution_id
as a UUID.api_deployment_views.py
:exceptions.py
:Notes on Testing
execution_id
format: RaisesInvalidExecutionIDError
.execution_id
: RaisesWorkflowDoesNotExistError
.Relates Issue
#1818
Screenshots
Error for invalid execution_id format
Error for non-existent execution_id
Trailing Spaces
Checklist
I have read and understood the Contribution Guidelines.