You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is in regard to the datetime component. Currently, the minute and second stepping seems to be tied to minDate, and that leads to a somewhat strange situation. Suppose stepMinute is set to 15, and minDate happen to be 2-Dec-2014 4:02 PM, the minute steps end up being 2, 17, 32, 47.
The work around is setting the minute and second components of minDate to be divisible by stepMinute. This issue is not readily observable when minDate is not specified because the default minDate value has zero for its minute and second components.
I wonder if it makes more sense to just lock the variables minM and minS in datetimebase.js (around line 101) to zero?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is in regard to the datetime component. Currently, the minute and second stepping seems to be tied to
minDate
, and that leads to a somewhat strange situation. SupposestepMinute
is set to 15, andminDate
happen to be2-Dec-2014 4:02 PM
, the minute steps end up being2, 17, 32, 47
.The work around is setting the minute and second components of
minDate
to be divisible bystepMinute
. This issue is not readily observable whenminDate
is not specified because the defaultminDate
value has zero for its minute and second components.I wonder if it makes more sense to just lock the variables
minM
andminS
in datetimebase.js (around line 101) to zero?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: