-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 396
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
BLT Blocking Installation of Upgrade Status Module #3615
Comments
I can confirm this isn't a problem with BLT 10.x. |
…d drupal/upgrade_status. 9.2.x.
IMHO proper integration of the command line tools should be added rather than the UI module. The command line tool can run in build/validation, unlike the module. The module is targeted at people who want full site reports to asses complete status of a site grouped by projects. THAT is not provided by the command line tools. I don't understand where #3386 went bad. |
I think that what Mike is saying is that the module has value to him if he can export the work to be done into ticketing systems, and drupalcheck allows him to do that. Without this feature, he is unlikely to use the module. What's the complexity of changing the export ? Seems like a nice win that adds good value to the module if the effort is not too high. |
It is not hard to make the module output ASCII formatted error reports, but we need to decide if that is what we do for each single module export or we have some kind of export format selector, etc. In the meantime drupal-check does what Mike needs and a lot more benefits in the context of BLT. |
If I'm thinking to export a list and import it into a ticket system, I probably want multiple projects, so maybe ascii export is most useful for the export of all the things and not individual modules. |
I tweeted at https://twitter.com/gaborhojtsy/status/1125767817624731648 to
get more data points from people. Will see if this results in anything.
…On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 4:49 PM Shannon Vettes ***@***.***> wrote:
If I'm thinking to export a list and import it into a ticket system, I
probably want multiple projects, so maybe ascii export is most useful for
the export of *all* the things and not individual modules.
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#3615 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABZNMPFWA3JO4CLADDH6RDPUGJGVANCNFSM4HKUQBLA>
.
|
Will there be the 9.2.9 release soon? |
the PR above was merged, i think this issue can probably be closed, don't you think @danepowell ? it also might be nice to cut 9.2.9 even though it's technically in LTS to unblock people on this issue. |
The next scheduled release is on June 5, per the support policy (releases are the first Wednesday of each month). This issue should have been closed automatically via that PR, not sure why it wasn't. The way to take advantage of this (or any other fix) prior to that release is to either update to the 9.2.x-dev version of BLT, or add this to your composer.json: patches: {
"acquia/blt": {
"Allow upgrade status module.": "https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/acquia/blt/pull/3621.patch"
}
} |
Describe the bug
When trying to add the drupal/upgrade_status module for testing, I am getting the following errors:
After digging, it looks like since we have the
sensiolabs-de/deprecation-detector
in blt 9.2 (https://github.com/acquia/blt/blob/9.2.x/composer.required.json#L22), which requiresnikic/php-parser: ~3.0
(https://packagist.org/packages/sensiolabs-de/deprecation-detector) and this is causing significant headaches. I'm not convinced that upgrade_status can be installed with BLT 9.2.x in its current state because of sensiolabs-de/deprecation-detector.To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior, ideally starting from a fresh install of BLT:
composer require drupal/upgrade_status
Expected behavior
Module should be added by composer
Detailed error output
Additional context
As far as I can tell, BLT 10.x has removed sensiolabs-de/deprecation-detector (see 4fe4cbe#diff-689639047be6809fd5ab243af5990fff). I am continuing to dig here.
@danepowell we should discuss adding this module by default to BLT's Drupal module list, as it is going to be a recommended addition to all projects moving forward to begin preparing for the 2020 release of Drupal 9.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: