2020-30 Limitations on public access should reference the UK Regulations for allowable reasons, not just the EC Directive (John Dixon, Defra)

[PeterParslow]

The encoding should remain as per the European guidance, so referencing the items in the INSPIRE registry. But it would be helpful for a UK audience to see it in terms of the UK INSPIRE Regulations.
John has a mapping document.

[PeterParslow]

See also #6

[PeterParslow]

"alignment of UK INSPIRE Regulations 2009 (The INSPIRE Regulations 2009 (legislation.gov.uk)) regulation 9 (2) and (5) to INSPIRE Directive Article 13(1)."

On leaving EU: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2018/1338/regulation/10/made

[PeterParslow]

John's suggested mappings are in this document (along with some stuff that's not relevant to GEMINI)
Data Sharing Assessment - INSPIRE Element Mappings - John Dixon suggested text.docx

[PeterParslow]

I have created a branch version of this file which I think captures the spirit of what John Dixon wanted to see: https://github.com/agiorguk/gemini/blob/PeterParslow-issue-17/docs/partials/limitationsonpublicaccess.asciidoc

[nmtoken]

Looks good; should you also update the change history

[PeterParslow]

"should you also update the change history" - I've been doing that with each pull request I create to DEV. This one is still in the 'do we agree' stage.

[PeterParslow]

Note https://github.com/agiorguk/gemini/tree/PeterParslow-issue-17 was created to implement this, but GitHub won't let me actually link it

[archaeogeek]

@PeterParslow did we agree to replace what we currently have with what's in your branch? Happy to do that, if so (as per comment on #61)

[PeterParslow]

That's the way I read nmtoken's Nov 2023 comment and I think that was confirmed in yesterday's meeting. I (or you) should update the change log & turn my branch into a pull request.

Yesterday I was pruning branches that had already been committed to dev; I noticed that this branch hadn't - in fact, it didn't even have a pull request which I could have done at any point in the past 10 months. Are you OK to do that, @archaeogeek ?

[archaeogeek]

@PeterParslow I've merged https://github.com/agiorguk/gemini/tree/PeterParslow-issue-17 into dev and deleted that branch. As per #61 I think the next step is to expand Guidance Note 7, so I think this issue can be closed?

[PeterParslow]

I've created #175 to document the change; after that, I agree this issue can be closed (& moved to "PR merged to dev")