Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use fetch/reset instead of pull for go-algorand in nightly test. #885

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 16, 2022

Conversation

tzaffi
Copy link
Contributor

@tzaffi tzaffi commented Feb 16, 2022

Tweaking the Nightly Test

GOAL: avoid this type of failure due to circle config flakiness going forward.

See this slack thread for more context.

Test Plan

See what happens to the nightly test next morning.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Feb 16, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #885 (716b354) into develop (70617c6) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop     #885   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    59.02%   59.02%           
========================================
  Files           37       37           
  Lines         4425     4425           
========================================
  Hits          2612     2612           
  Misses        1499     1499           
  Partials       314      314           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 70617c6...716b354. Read the comment docs.

@winder winder merged commit c7d39fb into develop Feb 16, 2022
@winder winder changed the title use fetch/reset instead of pull for go-algorand in nightly test Use fetch/reset instead of pull for go-algorand in nightly test. Feb 16, 2022
@tzaffi tzaffi deleted the nightly-test-tweak branch June 15, 2022 04:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants