Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix and check namada_benchmarks crate build with default features #1906

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 25, 2023

Conversation

tzemanovic
Copy link
Member

Describe your changes

Enables to e.g. cd benches && cargo test --benches with default features

Indicate on which release or other PRs this topic is based on

0.22.0

Checklist before merging to draft

  • [ ] I have added a changelog
  • Git history is in acceptable state

@tzemanovic tzemanovic requested a review from grarco September 20, 2023 08:50
@tzemanovic tzemanovic mentioned this pull request Sep 20, 2023
6 tasks
grarco
grarco previously approved these changes Sep 20, 2023
@grarco
Copy link
Collaborator

grarco commented Sep 20, 2023

I think we can also change this step of the Makefile:

check:
	$(cargo) check --workspace --exclude namada_benchmarks && \
	$(cargo) +$(nightly) check --benches && \

to just be

check:
	$(cargo) check && \

tzemanovic added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 25, 2023
* tomas/check-benchmarks-crate:
  make: refactor `make check`
  fix and check namada_benchmarks crate build with default features
@tzemanovic tzemanovic mentioned this pull request Sep 25, 2023
Fraccaman added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 25, 2023
* origin/tomas/check-benchmarks-crate:
  make: refactor `make check`
  fix and check namada_benchmarks crate build with default features
@brentstone brentstone merged commit 8c09f9b into main Sep 25, 2023
@brentstone brentstone deleted the tomas/check-benchmarks-crate branch September 25, 2023 17:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants