Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Prep 3.2.0 release #759

Conversation

alinabuzachis
Copy link
Collaborator

SUMMARY

Run add_docs, generate changelog

ISSUE TYPE
  • Feature Pull Request

@ansibullbot ansibullbot added community_review docs feature This issue/PR relates to a feature request needs_triage labels Mar 30, 2022
@softwarefactory-project-zuul
Copy link
Contributor

Build succeeded.

Copy link
Contributor

@tremble tremble left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A little concerned that we backported a breaking change, but otherwise LGTM

Comment on lines 711 to 713
breaking_changes:
- aws_ssm - on_denied and on_missing now both default to error, for consistency
with both aws_secret and the base Lookup class (https://github.com/ansible-collections/amazon.aws/issues/617).
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we have backported a breaking change?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@alinabuzachis alinabuzachis Mar 31, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@tremble I thought we could include this breaking change in 3.2.0. What do you suggest to do? Do we want to revert it and include in 4.0.0 directly?

Copy link
Member

@markuman markuman Mar 31, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Uh yes. I think it must be reverted from stable-3. It was mentioned here already #618 (comment)

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@alinabuzachis alinabuzachis Mar 31, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@markuman Can I do it in this PR or do we need a separate one?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, missed completely that comment.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If possible I would give it a try.

git reset --hard aeba19a # commit before that merge
git cherry-pick 7297e31 c06d77c 42295a7 d9d5d0d # cherry pick what comes after

and push with force? But I've no idea if that's more a punk way and will result in merge conflicts?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok, thanks. let me try.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

...plus rebuild docs and changelog.
naybe there is also a smoother "rebase" way.....

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@alinabuzachis alinabuzachis Mar 31, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I rebuilt docs, but I have to hard reset and do it from the beginning. It happened in the past the same thing with the docs. I am re-doing right now. I only used git revert commit_hash

@ansibullbot ansibullbot added lookup lookup plugin plugins plugin (any type) tests tests labels Mar 31, 2022
@softwarefactory-project-zuul
Copy link
Contributor

Build succeeded.

jillr
jillr previously requested changes Mar 31, 2022
Copy link
Collaborator

@jillr jillr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The changes to plugins/lookup/aws_ssm.py and tests/unit/plugins/lookup/test_aws_ssm.py don't seem to have been successfully reverted (we shouldn't have python changes in a prep PR - I might just be misunderstanding what's happening in #764 though).

@alinabuzachis
Copy link
Collaborator Author

alinabuzachis commented Mar 31, 2022

The changes to plugins/lookup/aws_ssm.py and tests/unit/plugins/lookup/test_aws_ssm.py don't seem to have been successfully reverted (we shouldn't have python changes in a prep PR - I might just be misunderstanding what's happening in #764 though).

@jillr Do we want to revert the changes in this PR or should I re-open #764 and merge first that one and then rebase this one? I am reverting the change in this prep PR at the moment.

@ansibullbot ansibullbot added needs_revision This PR fails CI tests or a maintainer has requested a review/revision of the PR and removed community_review labels Mar 31, 2022
@alinabuzachis
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I re-opened this one and will do the revert directly here #764 instead of having it in the same prep PR.

@jillr
Copy link
Collaborator

jillr commented Apr 1, 2022

Yep, let's sort out the overall status of the stable-3 branch first and then rebase this PR for docs and changelog only

Run add_docs, generate changelog

Signed-off-by: Alina Buzachis <[email protected]>
@ansibullbot ansibullbot added community_review and removed needs_revision This PR fails CI tests or a maintainer has requested a review/revision of the PR labels Apr 5, 2022
@softwarefactory-project-zuul
Copy link
Contributor

Build succeeded.

@ansibullbot ansibullbot added needs_revision This PR fails CI tests or a maintainer has requested a review/revision of the PR and removed community_review labels Apr 5, 2022
@alinabuzachis alinabuzachis added the mergeit Merge the PR (SoftwareFactory) label Apr 5, 2022
@ansibullbot ansibullbot added community_review and removed needs_revision This PR fails CI tests or a maintainer has requested a review/revision of the PR labels Apr 6, 2022
@alinabuzachis
Copy link
Collaborator Author

regate

@softwarefactory-project-zuul
Copy link
Contributor

Build succeeded (gate pipeline).

@softwarefactory-project-zuul softwarefactory-project-zuul bot merged commit a27a3fa into ansible-collections:stable-3 Apr 6, 2022
abikouo pushed a commit to abikouo/amazon.aws that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2023
…_password

ec2_win_password - migrate to boto3

SUMMARY
Migrate ec2_win_password to boto3
ISSUE TYPE

Feature Pull Request

COMPONENT NAME
ec2_win_password
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
While there are no tests for this module, there's only a single boto call to update
boto2 documentation of call: http://boto.cloudhackers.com/en/latest/ref/ec2.html#boto.ec2.connection.EC2Connection.get_password_data
boto3 documentation of call: https://boto3.amazonaws.com/v1/documentation/api/latest/reference/services/ec2.html#EC2.Client.get_password_data

Reviewed-by: Rick Mendes <None>
Reviewed-by: None <None>
Reviewed-by: Alina Buzachis <None>
abikouo pushed a commit to abikouo/amazon.aws that referenced this pull request Oct 24, 2023
…_password

ec2_win_password - migrate to boto3

SUMMARY
Migrate ec2_win_password to boto3
ISSUE TYPE

Feature Pull Request

COMPONENT NAME
ec2_win_password
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
While there are no tests for this module, there's only a single boto call to update
boto2 documentation of call: http://boto.cloudhackers.com/en/latest/ref/ec2.html#boto.ec2.connection.EC2Connection.get_password_data
boto3 documentation of call: https://boto3.amazonaws.com/v1/documentation/api/latest/reference/services/ec2.html#EC2.Client.get_password_data

Reviewed-by: Rick Mendes <None>
Reviewed-by: None <None>
Reviewed-by: Alina Buzachis <None>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
community_review docs feature This issue/PR relates to a feature request lookup lookup plugin mergeit Merge the PR (SoftwareFactory) plugins plugin (any type) tests tests
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants