Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 4, 2023. It is now read-only.

Revert ansible-changelog changes #811

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 30, 2021
Merged

Conversation

pabelanger
Copy link
Contributor

This is clearly broken, and no longer checks to see if we are adding in
changelog fragments.

Given we don't have the time to properly debug this, we are going to
revert.

That said, the proper way to do this moving forward, is to create a new
job, which the logic that is needed. Then smoke test the heck out of it
on a specific repo.

Then, over time we can replace all projects with it. Sadly, this was
rushed into service before. Not laying fault, but think we need to do a
better job at catching all new features next time.

Signed-off-by: Paul Belanger [email protected]

This is clearly broken, and no longer checks to see if we are adding in
changelog fragments.

Given we don't have the time to properly debug this, we are going to
revert.

That said, the proper way to do this moving forward, is to create a new
job, which the logic that is needed. Then smoke test the heck out of it
on a specific repo.

Then, over time we can replace all projects with it.  Sadly, this was
rushed into service before. Not laying fault, but think we need to do a
better job at catching all new features next time.

Signed-off-by: Paul Belanger <[email protected]>
@goneri
Copy link
Collaborator

goneri commented Apr 30, 2021

@pabelanger
Copy link
Contributor Author

@gundalow @quidame given you've been involved in this code. I know it is a friday too. I'd like to get jobs working again, then properly plan a new job to validate this code.

@pabelanger pabelanger added the gate Gate PR in Zuul CI label Apr 30, 2021
@ansible-zuul ansible-zuul bot merged commit f8915d9 into ansible:master Apr 30, 2021
@quidame
Copy link
Contributor

quidame commented Apr 30, 2021

@pabelanger Yes I know there was an issue, it is reported here #804 and fixed there #805 (I hoped, but who cares ?). I don't understand why you prefer to go backward rather than forward, but nevertheless, the revert makes that the error message is still inconsistent with the actual check, and the check itself still reports false positives as reported here: #771.

Really, what is the purpose of this check ?? I guess it is not to break git smartitude, so why does it break it ?

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
gate Gate PR in Zuul CI
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants