Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[v2-10-test] Fix task id validation in BaseOperator #44938

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 15, 2024

Conversation

gopidesupavan
Copy link
Member

@gopidesupavan gopidesupavan commented Dec 14, 2024

When dag contains TaskGroup, currently its not accounting TaskGroup id in the task id validation. Causing the scheduler loop failures.

backports: #44939

closes: #44738


^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named {pr_number}.significant.rst or {issue_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.

@gopidesupavan
Copy link
Member Author

before fix, able to re produce.

image

After fix, it will show as dag import errors.

image

@potiuk potiuk merged commit 5b7156d into apache:v2-10-test Dec 15, 2024
48 checks passed
@gopidesupavan gopidesupavan deleted the bugfix/task-id-validation branch December 15, 2024 09:29
kaxil pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 17, 2024
* Fix task_id validation in baseoperator

* Fix task_id validation in baseoperator

* add additional tests to check task id length
@utkarsharma2 utkarsharma2 added the type:bug-fix Changelog: Bug Fixes label Jan 28, 2025
@utkarsharma2 utkarsharma2 added this to the Airflow 2.10.5 milestone Jan 28, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type:bug-fix Changelog: Bug Fixes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants