-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 542
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
request help: websocket tab is lost in 2.0rc2? #831
Comments
Ya, from 1.5 to 2.0, we have removed some features which originally belong to plugins, you could find them in plugin page. |
But note, currently, in plugin page, some of them have UI issues, we are going to resolve all of them in 2.1 soon. |
according to current tasks, this enhancement feature will resolve in 2.3. |
which plugin should select for websocket |
no plugin need weboscket,which is binding with router |
I see, i will check this ASAP. |
in |
Hi @membphis, I see there has a tip saying the enable_websocket field will be removed soon, do we have any plan? |
Will be removed in 2.3
琚致远 <[email protected]>于2020年12月13日 周日下午5:07写道:
https://github.com/apache/apisix/pull/2836/files#diff-ebd29c155b76d68bb1cd728cd626f281f81c62ddb451b345baf2ed8f81480127R378
[image: image]
<https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2106987/102007595-7e9ad680-3d65-11eb-8e86-3edb3ccdc2eb.png>
Hi @membphis <https://github.com/membphis>, I see there has a tip saying
the enable_websocket field will be removed soon, do we have any plan?
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#831 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGJZBK5HYS4RGXHLOZEAEXTSUR73PANCNFSM4T3BLYBA>
.
--
Thanks,
Ming Wen
Twitter: _WenMing
|
I couldn't find milestone 2.3, you mean 3.0 or 2.3 has not been created? |
The frontend will still use that field for now. |
no, FE should not use it in upstream
琚致远 <[email protected]>于2020年12月13日 周日下午6:30写道:
The frontend will still use that field for now.
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#831 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGJZBK7BI4YGKBU36LZLCL3SUSJTVANCNFSM4T3BLYBA>
.
--
Thanks,
Ming Wen
Twitter: _WenMing
|
Websocket is binding with route now
Ming Wen <[email protected]>于2020年12月13日 周日下午6:47写道:
no, FE should not use it in upstream
琚致远 ***@***.***>于2020年12月13日 周日下午6:30写道:
> The frontend will still use that field for now.
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you commented.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <#831 (comment)>,
> or unsubscribe
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGJZBK7BI4YGKBU36LZLCL3SUSJTVANCNFSM4T3BLYBA>
> .
>
--
Thanks,
Ming Wen
Twitter: _WenMing
--
Thanks,
Ming Wen
Twitter: _WenMing
|
Please check the Chang log of apisix for detail
Ming Wen <[email protected]>于2020年12月13日 周日下午6:48写道:
Websocket is binding with route now
Ming Wen ***@***.***>于2020年12月13日 周日下午6:47写道:
> no, FE should not use it in upstream
>
> 琚致远 ***@***.***>于2020年12月13日 周日下午6:30写道:
>
>> The frontend will still use that field for now.
>>
>> —
>> You are receiving this because you commented.
>> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
>> <#831 (comment)>,
>> or unsubscribe
>> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGJZBK7BI4YGKBU36LZLCL3SUSJTVANCNFSM4T3BLYBA>
>> .
>>
> --
> Thanks,
> Ming Wen
> Twitter: _WenMing
>
--
Thanks,
Ming Wen
Twitter: _WenMing
--
Thanks,
Ming Wen
Twitter: _WenMing
|
Ok, now i know what happened, i heard from @membphis that this field is bound to Route and called enable_websocket, but when i saw that PR, i didn't see that change is related to upstream_def until you point out. Conclusion: The frontend will use that field with Route instead of Upstream. |
yes, that is right |
Please answer these questions before submitting your issue.
update to 2.0rc2 . websocket tab is lost in step one。
Has this feature been removed?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: