feat: add rawDataEditor for route, consumer, upstream and service

[LiteSun]

Please answer these questions before submitting a pull request

• Why submit this pull request?

• Bugfix

• New feature provided

• Improve performance

• Backport patches

• Related issues
  support to show raw data for Route, Upstream, Service and so on #1399

---

New feature or improvement

• Describe the details and related test reports.

---

Please add the corresponding test cases if necessary.

#1506

---

Backport patches

• Why need to backport?

• Source branch

• Related commits and pull requests

• Target branch

[codecov-io]

Codecov Report

Merging #1505 (62aae2a) into master (abaddcd) will decrease coverage by 17.06%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1505       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   68.69%   51.63%   -17.07%     
===========================================
  Files          48       39        -9     
  Lines        3038     2597      -441     
===========================================
- Hits         2087     1341      -746     
- Misses        712     1082      +370     
+ Partials      239      174       -65     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
api/internal/utils/version.go	0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%)	⬇️
api/internal/filter/request_id.go	0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%)	⬇️
api/internal/core/entity/entity.go	0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%)	⬇️
api/internal/core/store/storehub.go	0.00% <0.00%> (-70.41%)	⬇️
api/internal/filter/cors.go	0.00% <0.00%> (-66.67%)	⬇️
api/internal/filter/schema.go	0.00% <0.00%> (-55.47%)	⬇️
api/internal/utils/consts/api_error.go	0.00% <0.00%> (-50.00%)	⬇️
api/internal/handler/data_loader/route_import.go	27.41% <0.00%> (-37.50%)	⬇️
api/internal/handler/server_info/server_info.go	57.14% <0.00%> (-33.34%)	⬇️
api/internal/utils/closer.go	0.00% <0.00%> (-33.34%)	⬇️
... and 29 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update abaddcd...62aae2a. Read the comment docs.

[juzhiyuan]

LGTM except for the typo, we could merge first, but please add the related test cases.

[juzhiyuan]

both visible or readonly is optional, the default value is false.

[LiteSun]

no, both visible and readonly are required.

[juzhiyuan]

why they are required?

[LiteSun]

visible: If you set visible to optional, then the user can use this component without passing this variable, then the component will not be displayed.
readonly: Want the user to accurately call the state of the component

[juzhiyuan]

@LiteSun you could fix those comments in another PR.

[LiteSun]

@LiteSun you could fix those comments in another PR.

will fix typo soon in this pr.