-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 867
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Combine multiple selections into the same batch size in skip_records #2359
Conversation
@@ -198,12 +198,6 @@ where | |||
self.num_records += buffered_records; | |||
self.num_values += buffered_values; | |||
|
|||
self.consume_def_levels(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@tustvold FYI,
Sometimes like batch_size
is = 20, when read 15 records without consume.
Then skip 50 records, finally read 5 records for one batch.
If we call these consume api during skip, we will lose the 15 records.
Do you think remove these is reasonable 🤔
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This makes sense to me
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looking good, just some minor nits 👍
@@ -198,12 +198,6 @@ where | |||
self.num_records += buffered_records; | |||
self.num_values += buffered_values; | |||
|
|||
self.consume_def_levels(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This makes sense to me
Co-authored-by: Raphael Taylor-Davies <[email protected]>
Benchmark runs are scheduled for baseline = f3baeaa and contender = ce2bd1e. ce2bd1e is a master commit associated with this PR. Results will be available as each benchmark for each run completes. |
Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #2358 .
Rationale for this change
What changes are included in this PR?
Are there any user-facing changes?