Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[SANTUARIO-616] enable manual decryption of the EncryptedKey with KeyAgreement #305

Conversation

jrihtarsic
Copy link
Contributor

@jrihtarsic jrihtarsic commented Apr 6, 2024

Recently the KeyAgreement feature incorporating ECDH-ES, X25519, and X448 methods was the introduced to the XMLSEC library. Notably, several software vendors have already developed their own solutions. The objective of this task is to provide an option for bypassing KeyAgreement resolution if the symmetric key has already been supplied to XMLCipher.

See the SANTUARIO-616 for details.

Copy link
Contributor

@coheigea coheigea left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. @seanjmullan please take a look

Copy link
Contributor

@coheigea coheigea left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please resolve the conflicts

…curity-java into SANTUARIO-616-legacy-keyagreement-implementation

# Conflicts:
#	src/test/java/org/apache/xml/security/test/dom/encryption/XMLCipherTest.java
@jrihtarsic
Copy link
Contributor Author

The conflicts are resolved now.

@seanjmullan
Copy link
Member

LGTM. @seanjmullan please take a look

Sorry been busy with work, etc so the earliest I can get to this and other reviews that are pending my review is end of next week sometime.

@seanjmullan
Copy link
Member

LGTM.

@coheigea coheigea merged commit bbc0b2b into apache:main May 3, 2024
3 checks passed
coheigea pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants