Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(dao): Condense delete/bulk-delete operations #24466

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 6, 2023

Conversation

john-bodley
Copy link
Member

@john-bodley john-bodley commented Jun 20, 2023

SUMMARY

Per SIP-92 Proposal for restructuring the Python code base #24331 organized all the DAOs to be housed within a shared folder—the result of which highlighted numerous inconsistencies, repetition, and inefficiencies.

This PR (one of many smaller bitesized PRs) condenses the single (delete) and bulk deletion (bulk_delete) logic into a single (delete) method which removes a bunch of copypasta and helps to standardize the code.

BEFORE/AFTER SCREENSHOTS OR ANIMATED GIF

TESTING INSTRUCTIONS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

  • Has associated issue: [SIP-92] Proposal for restructuring the Python code base #20630
  • Required feature flags:
  • Changes UI
  • Includes DB Migration (follow approval process in SIP-59)
    • Migration is atomic, supports rollback & is backwards-compatible
    • Confirm DB migration upgrade and downgrade tested
    • Runtime estimates and downtime expectations provided
  • Introduces new feature or API
  • Removes existing feature or API

@@ -30,19 +27,6 @@
class AnnotationDAO(BaseDAO):
model_cls = Annotation

@staticmethod
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copypasta except the BaseDAO is defined as a classmethod as opposed to a staticmethod.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These comments are very helpful while reviewing. Thank you.

@@ -67,21 +51,6 @@ def validate_update_uniqueness(
class AnnotationLayerDAO(BaseDAO):
model_cls = AnnotationLayer

@staticmethod
def bulk_delete(
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copypasta except the BaseDAO is defined as a classmethod as opposed to a staticmethod.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice cleanup!

from superset.models.core import CssTemplate

logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)


class CssTemplateDAO(BaseDAO):
model_cls = CssTemplate

@staticmethod
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copypasta except the BaseDAO is defined as a classmethod as opposed to a staticmethod.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 20, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #24466 (f1fae05) into master (aa6870b) will decrease coverage by 10.75%.
The diff coverage is 47.80%.

❗ Current head f1fae05 differs from pull request most recent head 8d32885. Consider uploading reports for the commit 8d32885 to get more accurate results

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #24466       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   69.08%   58.33%   -10.75%     
===========================================
  Files        1906     1906               
  Lines       74156    74107       -49     
  Branches     8161     8165        +4     
===========================================
- Hits        51232    43234     -7998     
- Misses      20805    28750     +7945     
- Partials     2119     2123        +4     
Flag Coverage Δ
hive 54.14% <43.38%> (+0.20%) ⬆️
mysql ?
postgres ?
presto 54.04% <43.38%> (+0.20%) ⬆️
python 61.10% <52.20%> (-22.38%) ⬇️
sqlite ?
unit 54.79% <52.20%> (+0.09%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...et-ui-chart-controls/src/components/labelUtils.tsx 100.00% <ø> (ø)
superset-frontend/src/components/Tooltip/index.tsx 100.00% <ø> (ø)
...ses/DatabaseModal/DatabaseConnectionForm/index.tsx 81.81% <ø> (ø)
...otation_layers/annotations/commands/bulk_delete.py 50.00% <0.00%> (-37.50%) ⬇️
superset/annotation_layers/commands/bulk_delete.py 46.15% <0.00%> (-38.47%) ⬇️
superset/charts/commands/bulk_delete.py 44.44% <0.00%> (-46.99%) ⬇️
superset/css_templates/commands/bulk_delete.py 50.00% <0.00%> (-37.50%) ⬇️
superset/daos/annotation.py 56.00% <ø> (-31.24%) ⬇️
superset/dashboards/api.py 51.28% <0.00%> (-41.29%) ⬇️
superset/dashboards/commands/bulk_delete.py 44.44% <0.00%> (-47.23%) ⬇️
... and 37 more

... and 267 files with indirect coverage changes

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@john-bodley john-bodley force-pushed the john-bodley--dao-bulk-delete branch 4 times, most recently from 2208e64 to 51dc939 Compare June 21, 2023 05:32
try:
annotation = AnnotationDAO.delete(self._model)
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No need to return the object we're deleting.

@john-bodley john-bodley force-pushed the john-bodley--dao-bulk-delete branch 5 times, most recently from 5b99d4b to 8b63521 Compare June 21, 2023 16:24
@@ -1364,7 +1364,7 @@ def delete_embedded(self, dashboard: Dashboard) -> Response:
$ref: '#/components/responses/500'
"""
for embedded in dashboard.embedded:
DashboardDAO.delete(embedded)
EmbeddedDashboardDAO.delete(embedded)
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm somewhat surprised that #24465 didn't pick this up.

@john-bodley john-bodley force-pushed the john-bodley--dao-bulk-delete branch 2 times, most recently from 02e8b79 to cbb621d Compare June 21, 2023 17:26
@@ -36,8 +36,10 @@ def __init__(self, model_ids: list[int]):

def run(self) -> None:
self.validate()
assert self._models
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This logic is temporary. It should be cleaned up when we refactor the commands and enforce that validate doesn't augment any properties.

"""
Deletes a Dataset column
"""
return cls.delete(model, commit=commit)
return DatasetColumnDAO.delete(model, commit=commit)
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is more accurate, i.e., the DatasetColumnDAO rather than the DatasetDAO should be deleting the column.

try:
if not self._model:
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

DRY. The validate method already raises a DatasetMetricNotFoundError if the metric is not found.

@classmethod
def delete(cls, model: T, commit: bool = True) -> T:
def delete(cls, objects: T | list[T], commit: bool = True) -> None:
Copy link
Member Author

@john-bodley john-bodley Jun 21, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

items seems to be a more accurate/consistent than models, i.e., we're deleting database items/instances as opposed to models.

@john-bodley john-bodley force-pushed the john-bodley--dao-bulk-delete branch 7 times, most recently from ee29647 to 3620631 Compare June 22, 2023 03:58
def bulk_delete(models: Optional[list[SqlaTable]], commit: bool = True) -> None:
item_ids = [model.id for model in models] if models else []
@classmethod
def delete(
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The bulk_deletion logic differs from the delete logic in the sense that the former first deletes the relationships (which in actuality may not be explicitly required) before deleting the dataset, whereas the later only deletes the datasets (which in theory should delete all the records with an explicit relationship).

@john-bodley john-bodley force-pushed the john-bodley--dao-bulk-delete branch from 3620631 to aa543ae Compare June 22, 2023 04:54
@john-bodley john-bodley changed the title chore(dao): Condense delete/bulk-delete chore(dao): Condense delete/bulk-delete operations Jun 22, 2023
@john-bodley john-bodley force-pushed the john-bodley--dao-bulk-delete branch from 14664d8 to 6aaeed0 Compare June 30, 2023 03:26
Copy link
Member

@michael-s-molina michael-s-molina left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@@ -30,19 +27,6 @@
class AnnotationDAO(BaseDAO):
model_cls = Annotation

@staticmethod
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These comments are very helpful while reviewing. Thank you.

@@ -67,21 +51,6 @@ def validate_update_uniqueness(
class AnnotationLayerDAO(BaseDAO):
model_cls = AnnotationLayer

@staticmethod
def bulk_delete(
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice cleanup!

superset/daos/base.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@michael-s-molina
Copy link
Member

Thank you for the nice cleanup @john-bodley!

Co-authored-by: Michael S. Molina <[email protected]>
@john-bodley john-bodley merged commit 7409289 into apache:master Jul 6, 2023
@michael-s-molina michael-s-molina added the v3.0 Label added by the release manager to track PRs to be included in the 3.0 branch label Jul 12, 2023
michael-s-molina pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 26, 2023
Co-authored-by: Michael S. Molina <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 7409289)
@mistercrunch mistercrunch added 🍒 3.0.0 🍒 3.0.1 🍒 3.0.2 🍒 3.0.3 🍒 3.0.4 🏷️ bot A label used by `supersetbot` to keep track of which PR where auto-tagged with release labels 🚢 3.1.0 labels Mar 8, 2024
vinothkumar66 pushed a commit to vinothkumar66/superset that referenced this pull request Nov 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🏷️ bot A label used by `supersetbot` to keep track of which PR where auto-tagged with release labels size/L v3.0 Label added by the release manager to track PRs to be included in the 3.0 branch 🍒 3.0.0 🍒 3.0.1 🍒 3.0.2 🍒 3.0.3 🍒 3.0.4 🚢 3.1.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants