a 4-lesson course on preprints, the traditional journal-dependent publication process, and the future of academic publishing
| Tara Fischer | [email protected] |
| Gautam Dey | [email protected] |
| Jonny Coates | [email protected] |
| Aleksandra Petelski | [email protected] |
| Vanessa Bortoluzzi | [email protected] |
| Gilbert Kibet-Rono | [email protected] |
| Iratxe Puebla | [email protected] |
Plinio Casarotto
Christine Cucinotta
ASAPbio Fellows Program
ASAPbio Community
Communicating the work we do as researchers to the scientific community is fundamental to the advancement of science. The traditional mode of communication is through the formal publication of a written manuscript in a scholarly journal that documents the rationale, methods, results, and interpretation of the findings. This process entails 1) the submission of your manuscript to a relevant journal, 2) the decision by Editors at the journal on whether to accept the manuscript for further review by experts in your field (Peer Reviewers), 3) the decision by the Editors, informed by the Peer Reviewers’ recommendations, on whether to accept your manuscript for publication, 4) the preparation of your manuscript for publication, and 5) the final publication and dissemination of your work to the scientific community. Although this process appears straightforward, the length of time it takes can vary from 3 months to years, directly impacting the availability of our work to the scientific community and scientific progress. This delay often means that the scientific literature is up to 6 months behind current research. Moreover, once published, scientific articles are often held behind paywalls preventing many from accessing the work.
One solution to these problems is to make research articles immediately and freely available to the public at the discretion of the scientists are responsible for the scientific work. These types of research articles are termed ‘preprints’; manuscripts that are posted to freely accessible preprint servers prior to formal peer review and publication in a peer-reviewed scholarly journal. Preprints are regularly used for physics but have, until recently, been largely unused in the biomedical and life sciences. Although publishing and dissemination of our research is fundamental to our careers as scientists, how the publication process works, how manuscripts are evaluated by editors and peer reviewers at journals, and how scientific communication impacts progress in science is often not discussed or formally taught during scientific training. This course covers how the traditional journal-based publication process works by outlining how a manuscript goes from written by the scientist to published in a journal with an emphasis on integrating preprinting as an important step within the process. The target audiences for this course are trainees at the graduate level, junior postdoctoral researchers, and the general public who are interested in understanding the scientific process. The course content will broadly highlight aspects of the current publication system and how preprinting offers an avenue to accelerate scientific progress.
This course covers the publishing pipeline with an emphasis on the role of preprints at each stage. The specific aims are:
- To foster an understanding of the current scientific publishing landscape and its limitations
- To demonstrate the role of preprints in scientific publishing
- To explain the role of the scientist in scientific communication and provide guidance for responsible sharing of preprints
Following the completion of this course students should be able to:
- Describe the publishing pipeline
- Explain the role, and benefits of preprints in scientific publishing
- Perform effective and responsible scientific communication
Lesson I: Introduction to the evolving publishing landscape. This lesson covers the history of scientific communication and the traditional publication process. Challenges with the current system and emerging solutions are then discussed as an introduction to the remaining lessons.
Lesson I lesson plan or in Google Drive
Lesson II: Understanding and engaging with preprints. This lesson introduces preprints and their role in the scientific community, including a breakdown and discussion of key concerns. Finally, the lesson covers the components of a preprint and includes a guide on how to post a preprint.
Lesson II lesson plan or in Google Drive
Lesson III: The editorial process and peer review. This lesson details the editorial process at a journal and how preprints fit into that publishing pipeline. This includes the lifecycle of a manuscript, the peer-review process, post-acceptance steps and the advantages of preprint adoption for editors and publishers.
Lesson III lesson plan or in Google Drive
Lesson IV: The communicating scientist: How to effectively and responsibly communicate scientific research. Students will learn about the role of a scientist in scientific communication and the different platforms that can be used. This lesson provides an overview of how to adapt to different platforms and how to communicate preprints, and scientific findings in general, responsibly and effectively.
Lesson IV lesson plan or in Google Drive
Each lesson is planned for 1-2 hours and can be administered “workshop” style over 4 subsequent days in one week or 1 day/week over a 4-week period. Alternatively, each lesson can be divided into 30 minute ‘blocks’ for adaptation to shorter course times.
We value community feedback. Please ask any question or make any comments through the GitHub discussion found at this link: Community Discussions
You can learn more about ASAPbio here and FAQs on preprints. You can also check out the ASAPbio Fellows Program.