Refactor utils

[ashleve]

What does this PR do?

Significant utility folder refactor

1. Splitted utils.py to several files
2. Moved utils.extras() call from task wrapper to main() in entry files. This makes task wrapper solely responsible for managing behavior during failure, which I think has more sense than using it to apply a bunch of random utilties

Before submitting

• Did you make sure title is self-explanatory and the description concisely explains the PR?
• Did you make sure your PR does only one thing, instead of bundling different changes together?
• Did you list all the breaking changes introduced by this pull request?
• Did you test your PR locally with pytest command?
• Did you run pre-commit hooks with pre-commit run -a command?

Did you have fun?

Make sure you had fun coding 🙃

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 55.12% and project coverage change: +0.33 🎉

Comparison is base (8bd98d6) 83.66% compared to head (8f007e6) 84.00%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev     #541      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   83.66%   84.00%   +0.33%     
==========================================
  Files           9       11       +2     
  Lines         349      350       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits          292      294       +2     
+ Misses         57       56       -1     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/eval.py	87.50% <0.00%> (-2.83%)	⬇️
src/utils/logging_utils.py	19.23% <19.23%> (ø)
src/utils/utils.py	72.09% <56.25%> (+12.28%)	⬆️
src/utils/instantiatiators.py	80.64% <80.64%> (ø)
src/train.py	95.91% <100.00%> (ø)
src/utils/__init__.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.