-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 53
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: add core message payload validation #352
feat: add core message payload validation #352
Conversation
"application/vnd.aai.asyncapi;version=2.0.0", | ||
"application/vnd.aai.asyncapi+json;version=2.0.0", | ||
"application/vnd.aai.asyncapi+yaml;version=2.0.0" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should v2.0.0 add support for up until v2.6.0? 🤔
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's actually a really good point 🤔.
Sticking to AsyncAPI docs, I understand we don't as we don't mention any other allowed values than the current Schema for the current version.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM! 🚀🌔
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed! 0 Bugs No Coverage information |
Thanks for the reviews folks 🎉 |
/rtm |
🎉 This PR is included in version 4.2.0 🎉 The release is available on: Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
🎉 This PR is included in version 5.0.0-next-major-spec.18 🎉 The release is available on: Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
Description
This was initially added to v3 here: #334
This PR replicates it for v2.