-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 242
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore(core/types): remove Blocks
's Timestamp()
method
#1429
Open
qdm12
wants to merge
5
commits into
libevm
Choose a base branch
from
qdm12/block-remove-timestamp
base: libevm
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+21
−16
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
qdm12
force-pushed
the
qdm12/block-remove-timestamp
branch
3 times, most recently
from
January 23, 2025 08:38
1bc820a
to
2cf8ef3
Compare
darioush
reviewed
Jan 23, 2025
qdm12
force-pushed
the
qdm12/block-remove-timestamp
branch
2 times, most recently
from
January 24, 2025 09:41
29c0766
to
d590a04
Compare
ceyonur
reviewed
Jan 31, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
changes in the subnet-evm context are lgtm, but we should consider that this will break all precompiles (including precompiles in precompile-evm + subnet-evm forks)
qdm12
force-pushed
the
qdm12/block-remove-timestamp
branch
from
February 6, 2025 08:46
d590a04
to
40167aa
Compare
qdm12
force-pushed
the
qdm12/block-remove-timestamp
branch
from
February 6, 2025 08:50
40167aa
to
a0857ed
Compare
- `Time()` does the same as `Timestamp()` - `Time()` is present upstream, not `Timestamp()`
qdm12
force-pushed
the
qdm12/block-remove-timestamp
branch
from
February 6, 2025 08:56
a0857ed
to
40e07af
Compare
ceyonur
reviewed
Feb 6, 2025
ceyonur
previously approved these changes
Feb 6, 2025
qdm12
force-pushed
the
qdm12/block-remove-timestamp
branch
from
February 6, 2025 14:09
2b90a54
to
7a882f9
Compare
qdm12
commented
Feb 6, 2025
ceyonur
previously approved these changes
Feb 6, 2025
darioush
reviewed
Feb 6, 2025
darioush
approved these changes
Feb 7, 2025
ceyonur
approved these changes
Feb 7, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why this should be merged
In
core/types
, theBlock
methodTimestamp
does the same as the methodTime
and is not present upstream, this causes small difficulties migrating to libevm core/types.Block which doesn't have a Timestamp method.How this works
core/types.Block
methodTimestamp()
removedcore.NewBlockContext
to converttypes.Block
andtypes.Header
for calls tocore.ApplyUpgrades
How this was tested
Existing CI passing
Need to be documented?
No
Need to update RELEASES.md?
No