-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 616
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Dependency Condition Naming change: #1882
Dependency Condition Naming change: #1882
Conversation
// CreateCondition ensures that a container progresses to next state only when dependency container has started | ||
createCondition = "START" | ||
// StartCondition ensures that a container progresses to next state only when dependency container is running | ||
startCondition = "RUNNING" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should these be
createCondition = "CREATE"
StartCondition = "START"
// SuccessCondition ensures that a container progresses to next state only when | ||
// dependency container has successfully completed with exit code 0 | ||
successCondition = "SUCCESS" | ||
// CompleteCondition ensures that a container progresses to next state only when dependency container has completed | ||
completeCondition = "COMPLETE" | ||
// StartCondition ensures that a container progresses to next state only when dependency container is healthy | ||
// HealthymCondition ensures that a container progresses to next state only when dependency container is healthy |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
HealthyCondition not HealthymCondition
* "START" Dependency condition has been changed to "CREATE" as it waits for the dependency to atleast get created * "RUNNING" Dependency Condition has been changed to "START" as it waits for the dependency to get started.
a9b9a0e
to
4ac84e4
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, let tests pass plz
We validated that the arm integ test is passing manually. |
Summary
Implementation details
Testing
New tests cover the changes:
Description for the changelog
Licensing
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.