-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 555
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Handle disconnect route of Websocket #548
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #548 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 73.30% 73.30%
=======================================
Files 26 26
Lines 1487 1487
=======================================
Hits 1090 1090
Misses 324 324
Partials 73 73 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thank you, just what I need!
events/apigw.go
Outdated
CognitoIdentityPoolID string `json:"cognitoIdentityPoolId,omitempty"` | ||
AccountID string `json:"accountId,omitempty"` | ||
CognitoIdentityID string `json:"cognitoIdentityId,omitempty"` | ||
Caller string `json:"caller,omitempty"` | ||
APIKey string `json:"apiKey,omitempty"` | ||
APIKeyID string `json:"apiKeyId,omitempty"` | ||
AccessKey string `json:"accessKey,omitempty"` | ||
SourceIP string `json:"sourceIp"` | ||
CognitoAuthenticationType string `json:"cognitoAuthenticationType"` | ||
CognitoAuthenticationProvider string `json:"cognitoAuthenticationProvider"` | ||
UserArn string `json:"userArn"` //nolint: stylecheck | ||
CognitoAuthenticationType string `json:"cognitoAuthenticationType,omitempty"` | ||
CognitoAuthenticationProvider string `json:"cognitoAuthenticationProvider,omitempty"` | ||
UserArn string `json:"userArn,omitempty"` //nolint: stylecheck | ||
UserAgent string `json:"userAgent"` | ||
User string `json:"user"` | ||
User string `json:"user,omitempty"` | ||
} | ||
|
||
// APIGatewayWebsocketProxyRequest contains data coming from the API Gateway proxy | ||
type APIGatewayWebsocketProxyRequest struct { | ||
Resource string `json:"resource"` // The resource path defined in API Gateway | ||
Path string `json:"path"` // The url path for the caller | ||
Resource string `json:"resource,omitempty"` // The resource path defined in API Gateway | ||
Path string `json:"path,omitempty"` // The url path for the caller | ||
HTTPMethod string `json:"httpMethod,omitempty"` | ||
Headers map[string]string `json:"headers"` | ||
MultiValueHeaders map[string][]string `json:"multiValueHeaders"` | ||
QueryStringParameters map[string]string `json:"queryStringParameters"` | ||
MultiValueQueryStringParameters map[string][]string `json:"multiValueQueryStringParameters"` | ||
PathParameters map[string]string `json:"pathParameters"` | ||
StageVariables map[string]string `json:"stageVariables"` | ||
Headers map[string]string `json:"headers,omitempty"` | ||
MultiValueHeaders map[string][]string `json:"multiValueHeaders,omitempty"` | ||
QueryStringParameters map[string]string `json:"queryStringParameters,omitempty"` | ||
MultiValueQueryStringParameters map[string][]string `json:"multiValueQueryStringParameters,omitempty"` | ||
PathParameters map[string]string `json:"pathParameters,omitempty"` | ||
StageVariables map[string]string `json:"stageVariables,omitempty"` | ||
RequestContext APIGatewayWebsocketProxyRequestContext `json:"requestContext"` | ||
Body string `json:"body"` | ||
IsBase64Encoded bool `json:"isBase64Encoded,omitempty"` | ||
Body string `json:"body,omitempty"` | ||
IsBase64Encoded *bool `json:"isBase64Encoded,omitempty"` | ||
} | ||
|
||
// APIGatewayWebsocketProxyRequestContext contains the information to identify | ||
// the AWS account and resources invoking the Lambda function. It also includes | ||
// Cognito identity information for the caller. | ||
type APIGatewayWebsocketProxyRequestContext struct { | ||
AccountID string `json:"accountId"` | ||
ResourceID string `json:"resourceId"` | ||
Stage string `json:"stage"` | ||
RequestID string `json:"requestId"` | ||
Identity APIGatewayRequestIdentity `json:"identity"` | ||
ResourcePath string `json:"resourcePath"` | ||
Authorizer interface{} `json:"authorizer"` | ||
HTTPMethod string `json:"httpMethod"` | ||
APIID string `json:"apiId"` // The API Gateway rest API Id | ||
ConnectedAt int64 `json:"connectedAt"` | ||
ConnectionID string `json:"connectionId"` | ||
DomainName string `json:"domainName"` | ||
Error string `json:"error"` | ||
EventType string `json:"eventType"` | ||
ExtendedRequestID string `json:"extendedRequestId"` | ||
IntegrationLatency string `json:"integrationLatency"` | ||
MessageDirection string `json:"messageDirection"` | ||
MessageID interface{} `json:"messageId"` | ||
RequestTime string `json:"requestTime"` | ||
RequestTimeEpoch int64 `json:"requestTimeEpoch"` | ||
RouteKey string `json:"routeKey"` | ||
Status string `json:"status"` | ||
AccountID string `json:"accountId,omitempty"` | ||
ResourceID string `json:"resourceId,omitempty"` | ||
Stage string `json:"stage"` | ||
RequestID string `json:"requestId"` | ||
Identity APIGatewayRequestIdentity `json:"identity"` | ||
ResourcePath string `json:"resourcePath,omitempty"` | ||
Authorizer interface{} `json:"authorizer,omitempty"` | ||
HTTPMethod string `json:"httpMethod,omitempty"` | ||
APIID string `json:"apiId"` // The API Gateway rest API Id | ||
ConnectedAt int64 `json:"connectedAt"` | ||
ConnectionID string `json:"connectionId"` | ||
DomainName string `json:"domainName"` | ||
Error string `json:"error,omitempty"` | ||
EventType string `json:"eventType"` | ||
ExtendedRequestID string `json:"extendedRequestId"` | ||
IntegrationLatency string `json:"integrationLatency,omitempty"` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
undo the json tag changes, they're not related the the feature you're trying to add.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for your comment, but it's related to the feature because integrationLatency
field is not in the WebSocket message sent on the $disconnect route as @tinhda wrote .
If I remove .omitempty
json tag, TestApiGatewayWebsocketRequestDisconnectMarshaling would fail.
events/apigw.go
Outdated
ExtendedRequestID string `json:"extendedRequestId"` | ||
IntegrationLatency string `json:"integrationLatency,omitempty"` | ||
MessageDirection string `json:"messageDirection"` | ||
MessageID *string `json:"messageId,omitempty"` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Changing the type of a struct field is a breaking change, revert it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I reverted it in 5cdae93.
DisconnectStatusCode int64 `json:"disconnectStatusCode,omitempty"` | ||
DisconnectReason *string `json:"disconnectReason,omitempty"` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I couldn't find a reference to these fields in the AWS Docs, nor in the event libraries for .NET or Java.
Do you happen to have a reference handy? My search skills are failing me right now.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi, I found this sample online, you can also recreate this by looking into the websocket api gateway log in cloudwatch. I couldn't find anything in the aws documents neither.
Host: '3xcls223mg.execute-api.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com',
'x-api-key': '',
'X-Forwarded-For': '',
'x-restapi': ''
},
multiValueHeaders: {
Host: [ '3xcls223mg.execute-api.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com' ],
'x-api-key': [ '' ],
'X-Forwarded-For': [ '' ],
'x-restapi': [ '' ]
},
requestContext: {
routeKey: '$disconnect',
disconnectStatusCode: 1006,
eventType: 'DISCONNECT',
extendedRequestId: 'fvLJ9EMQDoEFXSw=',
requestTime: '22/May/2021:15:38:26 +0000',
messageDirection: 'IN',
disconnectReason: 'Connection Closed Abnormally',
stage: 'updatedevice',
connectedAt: 1621697605538,
requestTimeEpoch: 1621697906882,
identity: {
userAgent: 'arduino-WebSocket-Client',
sourceIp: '137.97.106.23'
},
requestId: 'fvLJ9EMQDoEFXSw=',
domainName: '3xcls223mg.execute-api.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com',
connectionId: 'fvKa4d88joECFDw=',
apiId: '3xcls223mg'
},
isBase64Encoded: false
}
Link to the sample: Links2004/arduinoWebSockets#667
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also found here: boto/boto3#3789
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Unfortunately I'll need a reference that comes from docs.aws.amazon.com
I'll otherwise make time to walk myself through the developer guide so that I can reproduce the test payloads in this PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there anything else I can do?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's perfect! Thanks for following up!
events/apigw.go
Outdated
Body string `json:"body"` | ||
IsBase64Encoded bool `json:"isBase64Encoded,omitempty"` | ||
Body string `json:"body,omitempty"` | ||
IsBase64Encoded *bool `json:"isBase64Encoded,omitempty"` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
breaks back-compat, revert back to bool
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reverted the change. 🙇
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Another field type back-compat issue snuck in - revert it and the accomanying test data json, and this PR should be good to go
events/apigw.go
Outdated
ExtendedRequestID string `json:"extendedRequestId"` | ||
IntegrationLatency string `json:"integrationLatency,omitempty"` | ||
MessageDirection string `json:"messageDirection"` | ||
MessageID string `json:"messageId,omitempty"` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
MessageID needs to stay as interface{}
for back-compat
@@ -97,11 +97,11 @@ | |||
"extendedRequestId": "TWegAcC4EowCHnA=", | |||
"integrationLatency": "123", | |||
"messageDirection": "IN", | |||
"messageId": null, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"messageId": null
should remain in the testdata
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"messageId" field is not documented for CONNECT eventType.
And I couldn't find out a way to keep this field here in the testdata and also to keep the MessageID field of the APIGatewayWebsocketProxyRequestContext
struct as interface{}.
If I can remove this field from the testdata, the MessageID field can stay as interface{}.
What should I do?
Thanks for your feedback, I'll fix the field type back-compat issue 🙇 |
Issue #, if available:
#547
Description of changes:
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.