Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Doppins] Upgrade dependency babel-loader to 7.1.3 #394

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 26, 2018

Conversation

doppins-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@doppins-bot doppins-bot commented Feb 25, 2018

Hi!

A new version was just released of babel-loader, so Doppins
has upgraded your project's dependency ranges.

Make sure that it doesn't break anything, and happy merging! :shipit:


Upgraded babel-loader from 7.1.2 to 7.1.3

Changelog:

Version 8.0.0-beta.1

💥BREAKING CHANGE

The babelrc option was changed. It now only accepts true or false as valid option (similar to other babel packages) and does not allow setting a string. If you previously had a filename specified you need to change to extends

 {
   loader: 'babel-loader',
   options: {
-    babelrc: 'path/to/.babelrc',
+    babelrc: false,
+    extends: 'path/to/.babelrc',
   },
 }

🐛 Bug Fix

  • Support webpack 4.0 (#550) (@lencioni)
  • fix compatibility with @babel/core option check when inputSourceMap null (#538) (@Delagen)
  • fix babelrc option behaviour (#583) (@danez)
  • use async babel transform (#584) (@michael-ciniawsky)

📝 Documentation

  • README: document babelrc option (#442) (@jedwards1211)

Version 7.1.3

🐛 Bug Fix

  • Support webpack 4

Version 8.0.0-beta.0

v8.0.0-beta.0


This change is Reviewable

@pcorpet pcorpet self-assigned this Feb 26, 2018
@pcorpet
Copy link
Member

pcorpet commented Feb 26, 2018

:lgtm: +@pcorpet


Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r1.
Review status: all files reviewed at latest revision, all discussions resolved.


Comments from Reviewable

@pcorpet pcorpet merged commit a2b49fb into master Feb 26, 2018
@pcorpet pcorpet deleted the doppins/babel-loader-equals-7.1.3 branch February 26, 2018 16:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants